Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rockrr
Which “states rights” specifically? The only one the rebel states ever mentioned was the “right” to own other human beings.

As has been pointed out to you endlessly, Every state in the Union already had that right, and Lincoln was going to make sure that this "right" would be even more protected than it already was.

518 posted on 05/15/2017 6:49:17 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

Which made the slavers actions even more stupid and treasonous.


522 posted on 05/15/2017 7:04:07 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp; rockrr
rockrr: "Which 'states rights' specifically?
The only one the rebel states ever mentioned was the 'right' to own other human beings."

DiogenesLamp: "As has been pointed out to you endlessly, Every state in the Union already had that right, and Lincoln was going to make sure that this 'right' would be even more protected than it already was."

As has been pointed out to DiogenesLamp endlessly, nonsense piled on top of nonsense does not make any of it true.
So Lincoln, for whatever his "political incorrectness" in today's historical context was in fact the first openly anti-slavery President ever elected.
That's why Deep South Fire Eaters declared secession!

553 posted on 05/20/2017 9:44:54 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson