Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rockrr
The United States Constitution provided the means to end slavery - the amendment process. But there was no pressure to abolish slavery. The new president said that he had no intention to change the status quo.

Oh, so you do understand that the "right" to own human beings was going to be protected by Lincoln?

So why did this "right" which Lincoln was going to continue, become unacceptable when people wanted to get free of Lincoln's control?

520 posted on 05/15/2017 6:56:48 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp; rockrr
DiogenesLamp to rockrr: "Oh, so you do understand that the "right" to own human beings was going to be protected by Lincoln?
So why did this "right" which Lincoln was going to continue, become unacceptable when people wanted to get free of Lincoln's control?"

Once again: "contraband of war" was understood as far back as our Founders, specifically, John Quincy Adams who mentored 38 year-old Congressman Lincoln in 1847-'48.
I think Adams understood that if secession lead to Civil War, then the President could declare fugitive slaves "contraband of war" and so emancipate them in states then under rebellion.

Yes, Lincoln was willing to settle for less than 100% abolition and citizenship for freed slaves, in exchange for peace, but Jefferson Davis refused and fought on until Unconditional Surrender, 13th, 14th & 15th Amendments.

555 posted on 05/20/2017 10:01:41 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson