Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: econjack

Eh, it’s not like JMBasquiat got to enjoy that kind of wealth. Even 10 years ago these paintings were only selling at $5,000,000 and he’d been dead for decades at that point.

Dead at 28. The fortune comes to those flipping the works after he’s dead.

And these prices are just a proxy for moving large amounts of money around.


16 posted on 05/21/2017 11:05:49 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (patriots win, Communists and Socialist Just-Us Warriors lose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: a fool in paradise

Back in the late 1940’s when Pollock was painting, or as I put it, throwing paint on a canvas. He had little money and was under the patronage of, I think, Peggy Guggenheim, he would trade some of paintings to the local grocer for food and beer. I have often wondered if that grocer kept them long enough to sell when Pollock’s started rising in price, especially after his death.


25 posted on 05/21/2017 11:25:49 AM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson