[Cementjungle]

The preponderance of evidence should be reason enough for a person not to have doubts.

I haven't followed this trial at all. Was there actual evidence, or was this the classic "she said, he said" situation?

[heterosupremacist]

Cementjungle wrote:

I haven’t followed this trial at all. Was there actual evidence, or was this the classic “she said, he said” situation?

I haven’t followed the trial, either.

Asked, ‘Was it in your mind that you were going to use these Quaaludes on young women that you wanted to have sex with, plural’ he responded, ‘Yes.’

That alone should be enough, IMO