Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RegulatorCountry

The slaves you mention did not belong to Grant or his wife. The were the property of Fredrick Dent. They were never allowed to travel with the Grants when they were in a state where slavery was against the law. Dent’s slaves were freed in January of 1865, when Missouri outlawed slavery. The one slave that Grant actually owned was given his freedom by Grant 1858. Plus what difference did it make whether Grant owned slaves or not. It was legal to do so time.


165 posted on 06/28/2017 7:30:47 PM PDT by Bull Snipe (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: Bull Snipe

What difference, indeed. Yes, it was legal at the time, and it remained legal in Union states until 1865 as you point out. Thank you.


168 posted on 06/28/2017 7:36:30 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson