“I think his original 1961 birth certificate is based on the residency of his mother, and not an actual birth in Hawaii. (as Hawaiian law permits.)”
On an adoption birth certificate is the signature of the doctor a wet signature or a typed name? How about the birth mother’s signature?
The date of the doctor signature (typed or wet) on an adoption birth certificate is that the actual date the doctor signed it or some date after the adoption takes place?
In your opinion is this an adoption birth certificate? (No wet signatures by doctor or mother)
My adopted birth certificate shows a doctor's signature. So does my real one. I used to wonder about this because there is no way the doctor could have signed my adopted certificate back when I was born, so it must have been signed subsequent to the event. I believe my state gets around this logical conundrum by including language that says something like "I attest that the child above was born at this time and place.", making it irrelevant when it was signed.
In your opinion is this an adoption birth certificate?
I don't know. I'd have to compare it to others around the same time period to see if it is distinctly different in this manner, but it is certainly easier to make a replacement birth certificate without written signatures.