yes, “their” I should have been used not “there”
Oh, so the exhibit is done with live animals.
Well, now I understand some of the objection.
It’s not a knee-jerk snowflake response at all.
No, sentient, domesticated animals should not be used in such a manner. If we were talking about Japanese Fighting Fish facing off, with one fish per it’s own glass bowl, that would be somewhat different, so long as they could move around a bit for tension relief.
Good. They were sadistic.
I read elsewhere the artist received a $300,000 grant from the National Endowment of the Arts. We are paying for this.
Gasp, I cannot believe that I must actually agree with the request to pull these exhibits.
Given that I’d choose an animal, any animal, over a low IQ snowflake currently infecting our universities, is there any way we could put some of the snowflakes on those treadmills instead of dogs or other innocent animals?
Like some cretinistic sociology prof on the mill with a Confederate flag taped just in front of him/her/it/whatever? Please?
Disgusting. These are live creatures, G-d’s creations, not inanimate objects to be arranged as desired. Excrement-for-brains, whoever sanctioned these acts of cruelty (sure as heck can’t be called art!).