What is said is your ignoring the substance of what i said and your recourse to ad hominem in lieu of a actual argument for your poverty of position, and which wrong assumes that those who are grieved by false doctrines on salvation and worship must lack joy and are just grim and unhappy and lost (missing the direct connection), which by implication would include the often-reproving Lord, and the prophets He affirmed. As well as joyous evangelical who yet are grieved by their own sins and that of the church and the world, and expressed it.
But what is reproved is a liberal happy face glee club Christianity that embraces disparate minimalist professors of Christ, a unholy "big tent" admixture.
Why not name a few of the faith groups that you include and those you would exclude from your ministerial association.
In your crusade to eliminate all "incorrect doctrine"
Which is typical desperate misrepresentation. I never exampled or defended a crusade to eliminate all "incorrect doctrine," but refereed to salvific and substantial false teaching, which are Scriptural objects of reproof, while affirming effective evangelical unity of the Spirit due to esteem of Truth (and a shared conversion).
You need to slow down on the intensity and enjoy the gifts of our faith.
Actually we have plenty to praise the Lord for and do so, if not enough, but rather than vainly resorting to ad hominem and psychology, why not just admit you have no real Scriptural argument for your position that reproves those who contend against erroneous salvific and substantial doctrines in order that souls may realize the greatest gift Our Lord gave us when he came here to reveal to us the direct connection that we have to the Father. Most Caths here seem to want to send us to their demi-goddess Mary the most, in contrast to the holy Spirit-filled Mary who, as in all other 200+ prayers by believers , prayed directly to the Lord. .
I’ll pray for you, Buddy.