^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
What does it tell, please? I haven't followed this aspect of Obama’s eligibility.
The Advertiser was a published work. There would be no need to “leak” a page from a printed newspaper that had Obama’s name in it if that page had been readily-available for 50 years. According to Wikileaks’ terms it must thereofore have been a government-created document, and very sloppy as it still had marks left from the C&P-ing while being otherwise ridiculously clean.
The Advertiser office listened to the immediate suspicions that were aroused and got rid of the C&P marks, added some “scratches”, and put a very, very blurry replica of it in Will Hoover’s article immediately after the election.
There are signs of microfilms being changed out at various libraries, and a couple of EXTREMELY ODD phenomena at 2 different libraries - one of which was such that the librarian accurately told me that the microfilm in their library could not be verified as authentic.
The genuineness of the birth announcement in those papers is extremely questionable.