Posted on 01/16/2018 4:47:11 PM PST by ransomnote
I nominate RANSOMNOTE!!
lol....
Please add me to list.
Sign me up, please.
I'm just showing how absurd it is since none of this entire flock can answer simple questions about what specifically has been of value in any of these Q posts. Picture me as Mark Dice, on the California beach.
Please add me. Thanks.
Your criteria comes across as haughty and unreachable to your standards.
Most reasonable folks would have fair-mindedly considered our answers and either accepted them straight away or adjusted their sensibilities however much needed and either wait to see about more evidence or gone on down the road.
You, however, seem to have a huge investment in winning a competition ... evidently for ego reasons ... while castigating the community for not living their lives according to your standards and prescriptions.
Wellllllllll, whoop-T-doo! to that. That's not our interest or value. We are sufficiently satisfied with the proofs very evident and persistent in the Q stuff to keep us interested and watchful. We find the assertions plausible and congruent. We are encouraged by the evidently looming probability in the evil doers being brought to justice and their wealth confiscated.
However, if you wish to sit on the curb with your thumb in your mouth; stamp your feet and pout because the world is not conforming itself to your image in such matters--have at it. Just don't expect us to join you.
We are sufficiently satisfied with the evidence presented. Our sensibilities and criteria are evidently not as 'lofty' or prissy as yours.
Your criteria comes across as haughty and unreachable to your standards.
Most reasonable folks would have fair-mindedly considered our answers and either accepted them straight away or adjusted their sensibilities however much needed and either wait to see about more evidence or gone on down the road.
You, however, seem to have a huge investment in winning a competition ... evidently for ego reasons ... while castigating the community for not living their lives according to your standards and prescriptions.
Wellllllllll, whoop-T-doo! to that. That's not our interest or value. We are sufficiently satisfied with the proofs very evident and persistent in the Q stuff to keep us interested and watchful. We find the assertions plausible and congruent. We are encouraged by the evidently looming probability in the evil doers being brought to justice and their wealth confiscated.
However, if you wish to sit on the curb with your thumb in your mouth; stamp your feet and pout because the world is not conforming itself to your image in such matters--have at it. Just don't expect us to join you.
We are sufficiently satisfied with the evidence presented. Our sensibilities and criteria are evidently not as 'lofty' or prissy as yours.
Not even pretending I get all of this, but hear of this QAnon, 4/chan, 8/chan, reddit, wikileaks or whatever stuff shows up quite a bit in my readings. I do read all of your posts/comments & really appreciate all the time you invest in keeping up/following all this. It is a tremendous help to me in keeping up with news as I at least understand on a high level other articles about this subject from reading your posts. So thank you so very much.
Yes, please, ping me! Thank you!
Yes please add me
bump
Ad me please. Thanks
Please add me in...
Count me in....it’s interesting
Please add me to the Q posts.
Thank you!
If you want to live in the past, trying to determine if Q left you some possible clue a week ago, in some cryptic post that could have meant anything, in retrospect and in the aftermath of an event that has already happened as well, then knock yourself out. Because you've already admitted that Q will never provide you enough information in advance, to accurately predict any specific event in the future. If you disagree with me that that is fairly pointless, then we can just agree to disagree. Thanks!
Please add me to the list.
One point on the YouTube video: At the very end, someone says, regarding the skeptics, “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” Yes, it is evidence of absence; it’s just not PROOF of absence.
Yes, please add me to your list. Thanks!
Please add me when you get a chance. Thanks.
Agreed.
Some people actively producing articles and videos re Q say they don’t have enough evidence to know if Q is who they say they are but that it’s obvious Q had asked the right kind of questions that members of the public are embracing and using to educate themselves and BYPASS the MSM! It’s triggered mass research on the public to gather information that the MSM doesn’t want us to have. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.