The great Q wager. Are you in?

[MNDude]

As we have seen, it seems like freerepublic has been divided into the two denominations. The Q Believers, and the Q disbelievers. Based on the claims that he made, I believe he will very shortly be either be proved or disproved. I think it would be fun to make a wager based off of this.

We can establish several specific things that he said would happen. For example, the undeleted text messages would reveal in assassination plot against President Trump or his family with the help of a foreign National Ally. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama will be arrested and will be proved to be part of a child trafficking, child sacrificing, satanic ring. Hundreds of those who we're involved will be arrested around the country and the world. Something like that.

If certain events do not happen by a certain date, like let's say May 1st or something, although I feel confident they'll happen much sooner, the Believers will be proved wrong. The believer would then have to make the following post on Free Republic. " I MNDude (or whoever) a tinfoil hat wearing kook. I believe silly Anonymous posters on the internet."

If it is proved to be true, then the disbelievers would have to post the following. I Caww or whoever) am a MSM follower. I only get my news from Anderson Cooper.

The loser would then have to change their tagline to say "I was wrong" and keep it there for 1 week.

I think I am ready to put my chips on the table. Are you game?

[Fantasywriter]

Your relentless nastiness and name-calling have discredited you. I no longer take anything you post seriously.

[grey_whiskers]

I never cared about your opinion of my anyway. I was fumigating the place on behalf of honest thread readers.
You *are* a troll and liar.

[Fantasywriter]

Maybe you can get me banned.

[grey_whiskers]

Why bother? It’s instructive for other posters to see how to handle trolls.

[Fantasywriter]

There are some who wouldn’t want to answer for ‘instructing,’ people to be nasty. Most people find it no challenge to be nasty. We belong to a fallen race, after all.

Or do you believe that the world suffers from a nastiness deficit? That it would be a better place, if we’d just take a lesson from the self-appointed instructors who are on a mission to give us practical lessons in nastiness?

[grey_whiskers]

In the New Testament, it says "Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good."

This includes calling out liars.

Jesus called the Pharisees blind guides and whitewashed tombs, but more importantly, He chided them for blocking the way for others (you know, like trolls do).

[Fantasywriter]

Your accusations of lying carry no weight. No matter what I say or how I say it, your response is to accuse me of lying. It’s just your smear of choice. When you throw it out so relentlessly, it serves only to highlight the amount of hostility you harbor towards me.

[grey_whiskers]

Your accusations of lying carry no weight. No matter what I say or how I say it, your response is to accuse me of lying. It’s just your smear of choice. When you throw it out so relentlessly, it serves only to highlight the amount of hostility you harbor towards me.

ROFLMAO!

I didn't accuse you of lying. I *demonstrated* it repeatedly, giving exact post numbers and verbatim quotes.

You're incompetent at trolling, too.

[Fantasywriter]

There are two ways to make a point. One is to use facts, logic, evidence and civility. The other is to smear and name-call. If you want to emphasize your facts and evidence, you refrain from loading your comments with ad hominem nastiness. If your goal is to attack a person with whom you disagree, then you go heavy on the insults and smears.

You do the latter.

[grey_whiskers]

You're pretty bad at covering your tracks, too.

Your accusation is refuted by my posts #180, #196, #197.

Now you're just playing octopus putting ink in the water.

But dragging nets are undeterred by ink.

[Fantasywriter]

The only clear point you’re making is that you harbor a relentless andburning hostility toward me. That point is coming through loud and clear.

[grey_whiskers]

You really ought to consider taking pills for that persecution complex of yours. :-P

Or better yet, stop trolling.

[Fantasywriter]

Your never-ending accusations of, liar,liar, really and truly make no sense. Evidently it’s crystal clear to you. But to me the accusations look convoluted, contrived, arcane, labyrinthine and tortuous. Add to that my conviction that everything I’ve posted has been honest—as I fully intended it to be—and your vendetta comes across looking more hostility-based than fact-based.

[Lakeshark]

People, I just want to say, you know, can we all get along? Can we get along?

Or alternately you might get a room somewhere.........:-)

[robroys woman]

I wondered. Yes, I was that Cuban Leaf.

I was banned as Robroy because of my cryptic and short posts on a thread about Pedophilia and Jean was misunderstanding what I said, So I played the, “oh, you must be a woman” card. Boom! Banned. Never, ever got a warning for anything. Official reason: Supporting pedophilia. But I wasn’t. I was making a case that others completed for me after I was banned.

I still shouldn’t have done it though. ON a side note, I’d been a member at that time for almost 13 years.

The reason for the cryptic messages is that it was the first time I had ever used my cell phone to post, so I was being very brief. Too brief, obviously. :)

If you’re burning with curiosity, just search for user Robroy and you can see what got me banned.

[robroys woman]

BTW, Jean died one year younger than I am now. Yikes!

And I’m sitting here with no health insurance...

[grey_whiskers]

Huh, then you must have overestimated your IQ.

The answer is in posts #196 and #197.

[stockpirate]

It’s as I’ve been saying all along, don’t waste your time on a poster who is no doubt a paid shill attempting to disrupt the board and get off topic.

Liberals are not noted for speaking the truth. No doubt he has help here or operates several accounts

[Fantasywriter]

‘a poster who is no doubt a paid shill’

Can you not comprehend how inane a claim this is? I’ve been on the site since 2000. Do you really imagine I’ve been paid for 18 years? For what? Sparring with Obots? I can assure you I do that for free.

If I haven’t been paid since 2000, when and how did it start? DID somebody notice that I had sincere, honest questions re Q, and PM me? I’d they say that if I would give them my personal information and would continue to post honest questions I’d get a paycheck?

You cannot really believe that. First, I’d give out personal information about the time Obama admits he was born thousands of miles from HI.

Second, if anyone made such a brazen attempt to dox me I’d report them in less time than it takes Hillary to say, ‘What happened?’ It would be public info in a New York minute.

If you must smear me, at least make the smears believable.

[bagster]

Whoa...I missed this outstanding post. I tend to forget about threads if I don't get them on my ping list. Rnote and Grey, this needs to have post of thread of it's own and is very compelling. My major takeaway from it is the Hillary arrest prediction. That's been the major talking point of Fantasywriter and others used as evidence of Q's debunker.

I always thought it was a weakness in our position. Come to find out it wasn't even Q who made the prediction. What say you to that, Fantasy?

Anyway. This post is thorough and very compelling. I would like to see it discussed thoroughly on it's own thread. I think it would go a long way in bringing people to our side. Greywhiskers, that took a lot of work together. ThankQ for doing it, goodman. There is genius within you.