If anyone is concerned that they may be confusing Q’s posts with the replies and comments of other chan users, there is a quick and simple solution. PM me, and I will explain the extremely easy process of identifying and differentiating authentic Q posts.
Btw, the posts re the public arrests, dates, etc, re Hillary, Podesta and Huma, etc., are all authentic Q.
This not all about you, goodman. Stop trying to make yourself a big deal.
I like how you've boiled down your anti Q crusade to this single issue. And are now making yourself the ultimate authority on the issue. You kinda sound like you revel in the role. Maybe you can go do an interview on Rachel Maddow and get yourself famous. The bad guys would love to have your expert analysis to support their attempt to fight us.
Did you take a vow to not respond directly to me? Is that why you posted to "All" just now? Watch guys, Fantasy will not respond to this post. I think I've made his head explode one too many times in the past and he thinks I'm a meaniepants.
Back on topic. Dude. For the sake of argument, let's say Q did in fact specifically give a date and time of Hillary's arrest. We all agree that it didn't happen.
Let's pretend Q is real for a moment. The team is making plans. The plan is to arrest Hillary on a certain date and time. Q leaks it. Between the time the plan was set in pladce and it's carrying out, MANY things could have happened to change the plan. Wouldn't you agree? Be honest.
My point is, you can't use that one data point to debunk the entirety of Q. So stop. And nobody considers you an authority on anything. So stop. And nobody needs you carrying water for the black hats. So stop.
Just stop.
You're way behind GreyWhiskers on points. (so stop)