[Fantasywriter]

‘Many people think Q is a close confidant of President Trump. If this is the case, then the purpose of the Q messages is clearly to prepare a few million people for a massive and shocking take-down of an entrenched, criminal, treasonous and international “Deep state” conspiracy.’

Too late. Q said very specifically that the big Take Back would occur—complete with very public bells and whistles—on and immediately after Nov 3-4, 2017.

Didn’t happen.

[for-q-clinton]

Yep. They ignore the wrong info and only believe the semi-accurate details.

Hint: if you’re falling for the Q stuff you probably are one of those that make the news fit your beliefs. Might even have a couple flat earthers in the mix.

[bagster]

"No battle plan ever survives contact with the enemy."

Learn it. Live it. Love it.

Free your mind, Fantasy. The rest will follow.

[JockoManning]

Obviously because such very complex issues in a very complex context COULDN'T POSSIBLY be rapidly changing with shifting priorities, hazards, etc. /sarc

However, given your Jr god position, by all means fling your lightening bolts like a machine gun, if you wish.

It only leaves you sounding prissy and looking constipated and OCD.

Which--is fairly fitting.

[Steven W.]

Ponder this - these are subtle signs and indications.

Sometime back "Q" posted something about the Awans - his message suggested something like this - in a "normal" espionage conspiracy, the perps are paid by dubious elements to steal state secrets. Who was paid in the Awan matter? Who was doing the paying?

The answer is that the DNC & their members in the House were paying the Awan's - lots & lots of $$$. It's considered that they funneled all this intel to Pakistan. It was previously considered that they they were doing this on behalf of some foreign actor(s). But that's not who was paying them! In context with what has been confirmed by FISC that the FISA Court had been corrupted by rogue intel agencies - and Maxine Waters' claim that Obama had set up a master database with everything about everyone ... consider that breadcrumb when considering - who paid the Awan's? What did they expect for their payments? Obviously solid + reliable & secure IT services was not on the agenda ... TBD ;)

[sdthree]

Saudis were arrested November 4th

First part of the takedown of /_\

[boxlunch]

https://www.forbes.com/sites/igorbosilkovski/2017/11/04/saudi-billionaire-prince-alwaleed-bin-talal-reportedly-arrested-for-corruption/
NOV 4, 2017 @ 11:06 PM
Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Al Saud, the wealthiest person in the Middle East on FORBES list of billionaires, has been arrested, according to various media reports. A source in the region also shared with Forbes a list of those arrested.

According to The New York Times, Saudi satellite TV network Al Arabiya announced that “11 Saudi princes, four sitting ministers and ‘tens’ of former ministers have been arrested on orders from the new anti-corruption committee headed by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.”

—————————-
He was a major contibutor towards many radical terrorist groups as well as major contributor to DNC.

This was the beginning of the dominoes.

[Disestablishmentarian]

>>Q said very specifically that the big Take Back would occur—complete with very public bells and whistles—on and immediately after Nov 3-4, 2017.
Didn’t happen.<<

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Evidently you didn’t notice that on Nov 3-4 the VERY PUBLIC ARREST of Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal bin Abdulaziz, a financier of the Clintons and LARGEST STOCKHOLDER of TWITTER & FOXNEWS as well as a large owner of DISNEY (owner of ABC) and Apple (repatriating $350B after tax cuts).

This was done by an ally of Trump.

Apparently he may(?) have just been released ... but with conditions.

I think this is what Q has been chattering about recently regarding cutting strings (i.e., of puppets).

If you keep researching this, Fantasywriter, I just have a feeling you may find yourself drifting into a modified point of view. If nothing else, it’s a good yarn, eh?!

[Non-Compliant_Deplorable]

Do you have the Q post where that was said? Or are you getting that from a secondary/tertiary/etc source? Every time a Q post is “analyzed” off the chan board, the person interpreting it adds additional, often incorrect or irrational, spin.