Posted on 02/01/2018 6:51:13 PM PST by ransomnote
This is your MO. You fire back with both barrels blazing insults and wholesale misrepresentations. Then you complain that I didn’t respond to a subsequent post.
If you wanted a civil discussion you should not have taken every opportunity to twist out of all recognition the polite and thoughtful comments I made in 273. If name-calling and insults are more important to you, then you should stop complaining that I opted out of the discussion. I’m not your verbal punching bag; do not expect me to act like one.
Could be. But I doubt if he is the one doing all the Q posting. But I have no idea really. I just read here and there and try to see what’s being said.
Absolutely.
Isn’t it interesting how the actual State of the Union speech, filled with great things for all Americans
ALL AMERICANS
that President Trump has done or is planning, woke up a lot of people who had been sucking propaganda??
Lying is not a long term strategy. Look how many people the Big Global Liars had to outright MURDER to get their evil goals accomplished in the 20th century. Lying only gets you so far.
You know, like posting the very contents of YOUR link which you claimed elsewhere, discredited Q.
Typo. Post 275, not 273.
And plenty of trapeze artistes on FR. Pretty hard.
Somebody’s ignoring 273; on that we can agree.
More importantly, you misrepresented everything I posted. That does you no credit.
Huh. Post 275 openly gives the link to your prior post about another site which you braggingly relied upon to discredit Q.
It gives your OWN link to that other site.
It gives a direct cut-and-paste from the other site with the information about who posted and the timestamp of that link.
That is NOT misrepresenting.
If John and/or Tony Podesta were arrested, charged and cleared of allegations of pedophilia I missed it.
As a matter of fact, as far as I know, both have been missing from the news for a couple of months.
As I remember it, some people even fell for the oh-so-phony
“FBI Wanted Poster” with their pictures on it, claiming they were responsible for the disappearance of the 3-year old British girl in Europe, on a day they were both in DC!!!!
This is the post that misrepresented my every word, and could barely fit all the insults into the space allotted:
grey_whiskers to Fantasywriter
‘Yes, you are a troll.
I explicitly mentioned the thread, and pointed out that all references to Q were put in as unflattering a light as possible.
You then deign to act like I avoided the subject, and try to tell me that the posts in that thread talk about theories from Q’s supporters.
And then you go on and on about 4chan, as though that site is esoteric and only *you* have heard of it.
And yet you blather on in vague second hand generalities; you are obviously re-telling the canned arguments of others which you have no direct experience with, nor the intellect to understand.
The 4chan argument about the photo from the Pentagon...*snerk*. The point was the individual who posted it, not vaguely “the Pentagon” : and within a day or so of Q’s post. That argument derives from vague hand-waving and the strawman of “obscurity” in that the photo was supposed to have been so unusual, that its posting was its own guarantee of authenticity. But it was the proximity in *time*, and the other individual who Tweeted it, that constituted the significance.
Q said it best about you and your ilk: “These people are stupid.”’
[It would take me literally all day to address all the lies. But on the fly, here are two.
One: on the same link I posted there were several Q-believers. Overall—taking all 4 pp into account—it balanced out relatively well. You quoted from one of the skeptics, but there were a number of staunch defenders as well.
That was pure bilge about me and 4Chan. I never even mentioned visiting the site. I said the centipedes at The_Donald monitor 4Chan/pol like hawks—which is true. I’m grateful for the ‘pedes. There’s so much I’d know little or nothing about if it weren’t for them; they’re a simply incredible resource.]
If the rumours are true and they are actually in GITMO(I believe they’re just laying really low until it blows over or they kill enough people to make it all go away-is that even possible?)it will be spun to reflect Trump as a Pinochet figure and the scum as poor abused political prisoners.
It’s early, apparently I didn’t make myself clear. Please provide a link stating that the charges of pedophila against John and/or Tony Podesta are BS.
I have seen nothing to indicate that is true.
I don’t know if they are in GITMO or just laying low. Lots of people missing from the news cycles lately.
I believe when/if charges are filed, evidence will be so overwhelming that only the brain dead and hard core liberals will spin it that way.
Now you're trying to get me into the weeds.
Sorry, but you lose.
Your cut and paste was from my post #272.
Look at the post itself. It is replying to your post #271.
Here's a verbatim cut and paste from your post #271.
Unlike many on this site the ‘centipedes,’ haunt 4Chan. They posted Q’s first predictions within hours of them appearing on /pol. As I’ve mentioned, the consensus was simple and to the point. If the predictions were fulfilled, the ‘pedes would conclude Q was real. If the predictions bombed, the ‘pedes would agree that Q was a LARP.
My comment on this was in post #272:
And then you go on and on about 4chan, as though that site is esoteric and only *you* have heard of it.
You know, because you put the word 'centipedes' in quotes, as though you were deigning to explain, since obviously, (as you said two or three lines later,
"A couple of feeble attempts have been made to revive Q on The_Donald. They’ve been shot down right out of the gate. The tech savvy generation doesn’t have a lot of time or patience for larpers, at least not re something this important. As someone else mentioned, Q is now considered a Boomer phenomenon. They believe boomers are more technologically gullible than they are. It would be very hard to argue otherwise."
You are thereby attempting to make this generational; which is why it is bilge about 4chan.
BUT, in this thread, in the very post that this is replying to, you end up by saying:
"That was pure bilge about me and 4Chan. I never even mentioned visiting the site. I said the centipedes at The_Donald monitor 4Chan/pol like hawks—which is true. I’m grateful for the ‘pedes. There’s so much I’d know little or nothing about if it weren’t for them; they’re a simply incredible resource."
You know, you could have said this earlier, while you were posting from the other forum, that you had been reading critiques, by the Centipedes on The_Donald, of Q. It would have been disingenuous, since Q mentioned other reasons for leaving 4chan, and indeed, has had denial of service / hacking type attacks against him even on 8chan, which are well known. Q himself went to 8chan because of other issues on 4chan; and had to form a private board even on 8chan when the Board Owner was compromised (Q retained control of the 2nd tripcode after the first was broken; further, there was even significance to the name chosen to be the keyword for the first tripcode).
-- but to bring it up *now* just sounds like a desperate expedient. You aren't related to Adam Schiff by any chance, are you?
(I know it's difficult for you to keep up with all the things you spin and have said. That's why you should just tell the truth.)
Now, in this post, you accuse me of lying, saying:
One: on the same link I posted there were several Q-believers. Overall—taking all 4 pp into account—it balanced out relatively well. You quoted from one of the skeptics, but there were a number of staunch defenders as well.
Right, because in your ORIGINAL POST (https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3624983/posts?page=418#418) you never mentioned them. I read the first page, found a lot of bilge, and reported it as such.
Since you didn't emphasize the "supporters" of Q till much later on, and you are not inclined to do anything more than ridicule them anyway, it is not significant.
Your dissimulation on this matter, is similar to that I uncovered and commented on within post http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3625922/posts?page=105#105 ...where you lightly pass off the fact that you had bragged about knowing who Q is, and then admitted in light of further reading, you were wrong.
If Q's having a prediction wrong discredits him for all time, what shall we say of you?
Word salad.
To be clear, post 296 is word salad. That is my absolutely honest, sincere and straightforward assessment.
You're either a troll or you're an idiot. What's your "tres-formidable" IQ anyway? (screw the missing accent grave on tres should you attempt pedantry. I'm in a hurry.)
In our system, it is up to the accuser to prove guilt. The sum and substance of the evidence against Podesta was that he sent an email saying he liked cheese pizza. If that's enough to prove child abuse, convict 30% of America a dozen times over. Mine had double cheese, pepperoni and a great sausage combination last night.... and was delicious.
The whole Comet Pizza stories about abuse and secret chambers for child torture were complete BS. There was never any substantiation to them at all. It got crazy; phony FBI Wanted Posters accusing the brothers of kidnapping a missing 3 year old girl in Europe, of having statues modeled from the bodies of Jeffery Dahmer's victims, a email from a grandmother saying that it would be fun to watch her kids play in a friends pool was evidence that they were being recruited for pedophilia... and those were some of the saner comments.
I have a standing wager offer for anyone who insists the Comet Pizza BS is real. We'll both put up $100,000, (or more if they wish). We'll let JimRob hold the stakes. We'll then fly to DC. I know enough people in the building department in DC that i can get us into Comet Pizza.
If there are any basement areas, secret torture chambers, or even tunnels where the “pedophiles could escape with the kids, then they get the $200K. If they don;t exist, then I get $150K, and I'll give JimRob the remaining $50K.
So far, no takers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.