Posted on 02/01/2018 6:51:13 PM PST by ransomnote
At this point it doesn’t matter, I went back to look at the trail and I may have sent you the last ( in question )by mistake.
LOL. Nice try. I said you are saying it is BS. Show me something other than opinion that it is BS.
Otherwise, my opinion that it is true is just as valid as yours. Perhaps more so. There have been hundreds of arrests of pediphiles this past year. There have been multiple friends/associates of the Podestas resigning or being fired due to “sexual assault” with more coming daily.
Until I see that they have been charged, tried and been proven innocent, I do not accept that it is BS or disproved.
Perhaps we could just revisit this conversation in a year.
No, he’s back.
I was thinking the other day about them meeting and some things that were going on in the 80s, things Reagan commented on/worked toward and how Trump seems to know all the wrong people without having gotten into bed with them. Those things suggest to me something else.
I've known about the Socratic method for more decades than I care to post and your stab at itsn't very good. ;^)
Because it sounds like a badly hypothesized version of "SEVEN DAYS IN MAY".
Because Trump was first told that he should get into politics by President Reagan, who was probably the first to sow the seed, which for years afterwards, was growing within Trump. This is obvious from the interviews he gave to many different people, re politics, for decades. And because he has seriously toyed with the idea of running for president, but didn't pull the trigger, for years prior to the suggested date the the supposed military intervention/pleadings supposedly happened.
You are embarrassing yourself. Stop digging.
The fact that you think Trump hires people who stink on ice and that Sessions is one of them, means you don’t get Trump whatsoever, that you think he is stupid, easily fooled, and a bumbling idiot.
I’m not going to bother interacting with you any more.
I knew about wee barry, long before he entered politics ( when he was just a lousy "community organizer" ), as did anyone who was sentient and kept up with local news.
I also know things about him and some of his "friends" and activities, that haven't ever been in any paper, book, or news program.Some of which I posted to FR threads about wee barry. Too bad you missed all of that.
No public evidence does not mean “No evidence has been found” or “evidence has been found proving innocence”.
Might be GOPe.
You accept that his purported parentage is accurate.
Anyway, I’m done.
And I know and understand Trump far better than you do; most do.
And yes, quite of few of his hires have indeed stunk on ice!So does his rumored choice for ambassador to Luxembourg, which IF that person does get picked, will only be because of friendship and donations, not because of expertise. This is the way of a lot of such previous presidential ambassador picks and par for the course; not anything new.
And I say this, because I actually know the rumored person well.
So to you, people are guilty because of rumors, unless they can prove they are innocent?!?!?!
As a matter of law, and of human decency, the presumption of innocence, sometimes referred to by the Latin expression ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat (the burden of proof is on the one who accuses, not on one who denies), is the principle that one is considered innocent unless proven guilty!
If you are so sure the Podestas are pedophiles, or that any of that Comet Pizza BS was true, then simply raise the cash by putting a second mortgage on your double-wide, we’ll all go to DC, and see who is right.
If you are right, it should be the easiest $100,000 you ever make.... or are you afraid?????
You mentioned Sessions in one comment, IIRC. Maybe you didn’t and were replying to someone and referring to him.
Doesn’t matter.
I am not sure of Podestas, pedophiles or anything else. All I said is that lack of PUBLIC evidence is not proof of innocence, and the statement about innocent until proven guilty is legal, and anyone anywhere is free to post, write or speak opinions on this or any other matter without violating any laws. FR is not a courtroom.
You are really stretching and using classic dirty debate tactics.
This is the last time I will reply to you. Dirty debate tactics are not my forte or fun.
Oops, I mixed up your comment to me with someone else’s. Mistake on my part.
Ack, yet another mistake. I mixed up replies and people. Sorry.
I posted this to the wrong person, was trying to reply to you.
You mentioned Sessions in one comment, IIRC. Maybe you didn’t and were replying to someone and referring to him.
Rregarding the ambassador, obviously not every pick of Trump’s is solid gold. Luckily ambassadors are not as important to running the country as the AG.
Doesn’t matter, the main thing is that you are really stretching and using classic dirty debate tactics.
This is the last time I will reply to you. Dirty debate tactics are not my forte or fun.
You deduce I live in a double wide because I disagree with you?
I’ll talk to you again in a year.
And yes, most ambassador picks are "pay-off", in one way off another and this has been the way of things for centuries; however, the rumor ( which I hope is not true ) has stuck in my craw, since I found out about it, since I know the person and if true, is about as stupid as Obama sending Caroline Kennedy to Japan; perhaps worse.
And as far as "dirty debate tactics" go, you are suffering from projection.
Afraid, eh?
Put up or shut up!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.