To: sten
The bigger question is why?. Why did the US Navy stop its rail gun project? (did it?) Is the technology flawed? Or did they come up with something better? There must be a good reason
To: captain_dave
The results are too little for the money expended compared to more conventional advanced weapons.
10 posted on
02/06/2018 6:09:36 AM PST by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: captain_dave
Obama, no money and of course, Russia.
12 posted on
02/06/2018 6:15:28 AM PST by
dforest
(Never let a Muslim cut your hair.)
To: captain_dave
Last I heard the gun worked but they had no useable projectiles or something along those lines.
14 posted on
02/06/2018 8:01:58 AM PST by
reed13k
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson