Posted on 02/28/2018 1:29:04 AM PST by ransomnote
Thank you so much for that.
Some of those EO’s go back years, were done by GWB? From the links you provided a search can be done to find EO’s created years ago.
Keanu has been through the hollywood meat grinder (davidgeffen)
He managed to rise above it.
Good man.
And yesterday's speculation that Hope Hicks would "executive privilege" all her testimony? Poof. Nine hours, and she answered every.single.question put to her about her time on the campaign, up to election day. DEMs say she is hiding something and want to subpoena her. LOL.
1. Hey wait a minute.
I just realized something that raises some disturbing questions about Susan Rice’s letter
Continued at link
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/968736425783984128.html
I’m really starting to think that mockingbird is DEAD.
You posted this pic on yesterday's thread. I just did a search for images of crisis actors in general, not just Parkland. EVERY SINGLE youtube I clicked on (more than a dozen) in relation to an image of a crisis actor has been deleted. Of course, every youtube denying there is such a thing as a crisis actor is up and running. How fast will search engines block images as well? Welcome to Amerika.
Imagine if the MSM’s daily delivered talking points were now replaced with information about positive accomplishments of the Trump Administration........
I've got my eye on that possibility too. Maybe we are just in a news lull, but typically Trump's twitter taunts would cause a coordinated flurry of negative press.
He's "lashing out at Sessions" this morning. But all the turmpoil in the WH stories are on Ivanka, Jared, and Kelly. Sad.
Even the Hope Hicks story hasn't fired up the "WH in cover-up mode" generator.
Youtube is flushing vids, related to Parkland/actors, etc., fast.
I saw where Corsi tweeted that some of his vids are now being flushed, by YT, as well.
WaPo headline doesn't disappoint! Trump lashes out at attorney general over alleged surveillance abuses
I missed the Hicks story. I’m working on Parscale’s trolls on twitter.
Amen.
There were a few musicians in the 90’s grunge scene who threw out a lot of not so thinly veiled barbs, too. I’ve always found the video for “Sunday” by Sonic Youth disturbing, I think I know why now. And they were with Geffen. Culkin’s long been a messed up dude, seems to me they finally got to him and he’s spent his life since dealing with the repercussions, with not much success. Another mess of a person who’s tried to warn and spoken out at risk of her career has been, believe it or not, Courtney Love.
Is a total non-issue, because the basic allegation is collusion BEFORE the election.
Having to re-evaluate my contempt for C. Love is just a bridge too far, RC.
Although it makes me wonder about W. Ryder now and if she ain’t working on it, too.
I have read his posts myself, as well, and find them pretty vague and impenetrable.
I am, therefore, a Q agnostic. I am not at all sure that he is legitimately what people say he his, but I am also not willing to say that he's a complete fraud.
Another Freeper whom I admire, in a brief chat we had on the topic of Q said it reminded him of "Whitehouse Insider". For those who don't remember: Whitehouse Insider was supposedly a high ranking person in the Obama administration who communicated via interviews with one reporter and was always claiming that Obama was on the verge of being exposed, on the verge of a breakdown, and things like that.
It very much confirmed the narrative of Obama-haters (I'm a member in good-standing of that group) that he as over his head, largely controlled by Jarrett, and that the Mooch is a bitch.
But, none of the extraordinary claims ever came true. I'm not sure when even happened to the posts, I can't seem to Google them up right now. Anyone have a link?
Anyway, the point is: Qanon sounds great to Trump supporters and haters of "the Swamp", it is the perfect fairy tale for us, in the same way Whitehouse Insider was the perfect fairly tale five years ago, but many questions remain. But is it too good to be true?
Questions for Qanon Followers:
1. Would you describe yourself as a believer, agnostic, skeptic or denier?
2. If you are a believer, what are the one or two events / posts that have most convinced you that he is genuine?
3. At several points Qanon has predicted that the SHTF moment is in "weeks". Yet, it has not ever happened. That is: nothing on a major scales that he's claimed will happen, has happened. No mass arrests of people reported, no single arrest of a high-visibility Swamp Creature. Do his failed timelines not make you skeptical?
4. If the extravagant claims made for Q are true at some point we will have to start reading newspaper accounts of people being arrested, companies being raided, etc. At what point do you expect to see these things?
5. If we do not see this, and the only existence proof for Q continues to be his own cryptic postings, at what point in time will you conclude that it's all BS (as most of eventually did about White House Insider?
6. Which Qanon prediction or scenario outcome do you feel is most likely to become externally visible (for instance: 6 well known people arrested being reported on Fox News) and validate your belief in his posts?
Operation Mockingbird being shut down last week should be enough to convince anyone that Q is at least in the loop, never mind all the lesser synchronicities.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.