I’ll be in the last group. ;)
There is also a lot of variability in susceptibility to diabetic complications. There are patients who are tightly controlled, but still wind up with retinopathy, kidney disease, neuropathy, etc., while others who are poorly controlled wind up escaping all complications.
Great - 25 news laws to be passed soon. And the never-ending commercials on TV, too.
I couldn’t tell from the article how 3, 4 and 5 are different other than by degree. 1, 2 and the final 3 all have different mechanisms so I could see three types, but not 5 types.
I would add another group based on personal experience. Type II diabetics who are a result of a damaged pancreas.
No cluster V?
I’m not going to bother to read the article. Some progress is good, but it’s not enough.
Diabetes is a group of symptoms, not a disease. Doctors dont understand this. Hence most people have nothing but hyperbole in their quiver.
“Diabetes” is one foot in the grave. It should be taken much more seriously at the earliest symptoms.
Hope for the day that a vaccine against diabetes will become available.