Sessions - you mean the guy that Trump dissed the other day and he snarked back at Trump?
Are you saying that’s just an act? It seems a bit far-fetched.
I’ll believe Sessions is on Trump’s side when I see who this investigator he picked this week is. I just hope it’s not one of Mueller’s buddies.
Read the C Treehouse article
Mar 08 2018 08:46:32
Q
!UW.yye1fxo
587467
Do you TRUST SESSIONS?
BOOM.
Q
I'll mark you down for a no.
Yes...we can call it an “act” although I prefer “tactical disinformation”.
Conservative Tree House (CTH) has really laid out quite well what’s going on and emphasizes the “distance” Trump and Sessions must keep. Overall the CTH article confirms Sessions IS working.
Here’s how I have felt: Trump didn’t get where he is by being a pushover and tolerant of inaction. I spent over 30 years in mechanical construction the vast majority in a union environment. There was many a time when our owner or superintendent would visit a site to check progress or lack thereof. When the latter was at issue, it didn’t take too awfully long to determine new blood was in order, so the command to a foreman of “Get his money!” (a layoff of the slacker)would often be heard.
The construction business is brutal, and that opinion was forged working in central Ohio. I cannot imagine what it would be like in New York where Trump thrived. I’m betting DJT ran off a good many individuals and subs when his goals weren’t being met and quickly, too.
If Sessions was NOT doing the job, Trump, by now, would’ve gotten Sessions’ money.
Think “Rope-A-Dope”.
Look at the EO that was then produced by AG, RR and SG re military tribunals - you really didn’t think that dinner was their way of snarking, do you? Ignore the MSM narrative (the annex was over 600 pages!) Trust GEOTUS ;)