Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arizona seniors could be in line for a BIG property-tax break
Sierra Vista Herald ^ | Howard Fischer Capitol Media Services

Posted on 03/16/2018 6:07:38 AM PDT by SandRat

PHOENIX — Some Arizona seniors could be in line for a big property tax break -- including some that a few lawmakers question whether they deserve it.

The House Ways and Means Committee voted 6-2 Wednesday to grant Class 6 status to the homes of seniors who meet certain income requirements.

What makes that significant is Class 6 properties are assessed for tax purposes at 5 percent of their assessed valuation. So a home worth $200,000 would get an assessed valuation of $10,000.

And if the combined property tax rate is $12 per $100 of assessed valuation, that would put their total property taxes at $1,200.

By contrast, residential property normally is Class 6, assessed at 10 percent of value. So for the same home in the same taxing district, the $20,000 assessed value translates to a $2,400 tax bill.

The dividing line between the two categories is based on age -- the homeowner must be 65 -- and income, a figure based on federal supplemental security income payments. For the current year, that is $35,184 for individuals and $43,980 for couples.

"These are low-income seniors that oftentimes are trying to decide whether they buy medication or they pay their taxes or their mortgage,'' said former Senate President Russell Pearce. He said those who don't want the change "would rather have little old folks thrown out of their home because they can't afford a tax.''

But Kevin McCarthy, executive director of the Arizona Tax Research Association, said it's not as simple as that.

As a threshold issue, McCarthy noted that property taxes for many jurisdictions are a zero-sum game: They are permitted to raise a certain amount of money. What that means is that if some property owners pay less, the difference is passed along to the owners of all the other properties.

That's of particular concern to McCarthy whose organization represents many major taxpayers.

And there's something else.

McCarthy pointed out that the proposal has no restriction on the value of the property.

He said he found one home, valued at $1.67 million which is owned by a person who would qualify for the tax break. McCarthy also told lawmakers he found "scores of property worth more than the home you're probably living in.''

Then there's the question of equity.

"Somebody making $36,000 a year with the identical home doesn't qualify for the break while the neighbor making $34,000 a year does,'' McCarthy said. He said the lack of a cap on the value of eligible homes could mean a senior making $34,000 would end up paying less in property taxes than someone who makes $36,000 who owns a more modest house.

And in all cases, the homeowners would be getting the same services.

McCarthy said his research shows there are more than 13,000 homeowners who qualify in Maricopa County alone. He had no figures for the state's 14 other counties.

What's in SB 1268 would be on top of special treatment already afforded to some seniors.

Arizona law spells out that if they qualify, the assessed value of their property is frozen. While that does not necessarily freeze their tax bill -- jurisdictions are free to raise the tax rate -- it is designed to ensure that eligible seniors are protected against higher bills solely because the value of their property has increased.

There are some additional restrictions on what properties would qualify.

In general, someone has to own the property for at least two years and it must be used as the owner's principal residence. The legislation also says that a person cannot have any legal interest in any other real property other than through an investment like a mutual fund which may have real property in its portfolio.

There also is a limit on the parcel size: It can be no more than 10 acres, though exceptions up to 40 acres are allowed if there are physical restrictions like mountains, washes and and roads that limit the usable area.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Local News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 03/16/2018 6:07:38 AM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Funny. My tax bill in KY for a ten year old home and 32 acres is under $600 and when I turn 65 in a few months it will be cut in half.

Which is just another thing I love about this state. Also, we can go outside during the day in summer, unlike much of Arizona*. :)

*a lot of our family lives in the Phoenix area. We love it in wintertime. Summer, not so much.


2 posted on 03/16/2018 6:21:32 AM PDT by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm using my wife's account.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman; SpinnerWebb
Funny. My tax bill in KY for a ten year old home and 32 acres is under $600 and when I turn 65 in a few months it will be cut in half.

As a senior in the Houston area I pay $4200 in property taxes on a $300K home.
State sales tax is 6.25%
State income tax on all income is NADA, zip, zero

Kentucky state sales tax is 6%

Kentucky state income tax starts at 4% on the first $4K - goes to 5.8% after $8K and tops out at 6% for anything over $75K
Total income tax on $100K = $5700+

I'm no math wiz, but I like the numbers here in Texas .... and I like Texas

3 posted on 03/16/2018 7:08:25 AM PDT by tx_eggman (Liberalism is only possible in that moment when a man chooses Barabas over Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Meanwhile, Delaware has cut seniors exemption from $1000 to $500 to $400 in three years. The ongoing Demoncrats war on seniors. They want us to die and die quickly. Then SSS will have plenty of money to give to “disabled” illegals.


4 posted on 03/16/2018 7:16:02 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Property taxes prove no individual owns land or home. You rent it from the state. It is a deterrent for improving your property. Because fixing your house raises its value which raises your taxes or rent. The government does this without investments. Government and taxes are the ultimate deception.


5 posted on 03/16/2018 7:59:09 AM PDT by Retvet (Retvet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tx_eggman

When did you get the OV65 exemption?

Those not yet 65 are getting creamed... $5200 on a 245k house


6 posted on 03/16/2018 10:55:23 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

I’m confused.. Why do they need to grant Class 6 status to these old-people homes, if residential properties are already Class 6 properties? Methinks this publication could use a new editor!


7 posted on 03/17/2018 7:59:35 AM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson