From the QAnon site:
I heard on the news today that the investigators were somewhat baffled that no glass from the shattered window was inside the cabin.
Odd because the sharpnel came from outside of the plane and should have left some of the window inside the cabin.
Internal explosion?
Also look closely at the fiberglass insulation at the upper right of the window frame, it is discolored where all of the other around the frame is not. Last only one blade from the engine came off and the shroud around the front of the engine should have kept the debris from escaping, that is what it is designed to do
Video at link with Pilot explaining :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKLcOgvgCcU
Jury is still out
Keep digging as we say on Qanon ....
NEW Q
1179
Apr 19 2018 00:17:16 (EST) Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: ff4010 1098359 NEW
Why are Ds aggressively attacking Pruitt?
Why is the MSM aggressively attacking Pruitt?
https://nypost.com/2017/08/05/sessions-investigating-slush-fund-used-by-left-wing-groups/
Are you awake?
Q
151 link for later
The window wouldn't need to shatter to fail and cause the sudden loss of cabin pressure. The closest incident I could find was BA flight 5390 in 1990, where the left windshield separated.
The plane had climbed to 17,400 feet (5,300 m) over Didcot, Oxfordshire. Suddenly, there was a loud bang, and the fuselage quickly filled with condensation. The left windscreen, on the captain's side of the flight deck, had separated from the forward fuselage. Lancaster was propelled out of his seat by the rushing air from the rapid decompression and forced head first out of the flight deck, his knees snagging onto the flight controls. This left him with his whole upper torso out of the aircraft, and only his legs inside.
I don't think the unlucky passenger was targeted specifically. Prayers up for her family.
No internal explosion. They need to call the passengers around the woman sucked half out. Poor woman.
They specifically test engines for those type of failures to insure debris stays in the engine
Blade failure test:
Weather/bird strike test
A well done video, picking a nit, the engine in question is a turbofan, not a turbo jet. Course if the guy was USAF, and a B-52 guy the mistake understandable.