Posted on 04/22/2018 5:32:43 PM PDT by ransomnote
I checked it wasn’t Spencer Tracey he was Capt Culpeper it was the police cheif.
Police Chief Aloysius : [to Captain Culpeper] It’s no. The answer is no. He won’t back any increase in pensions. He won’t even talk about it. And there won’t be any increase in pensions. And do you know why? Because they got a solid majority of both Republicans and Democrats who’ve agreed that if anything is said about pensions, they’ll actually reduce your pension! Why? Because they know that you personally were more responsible than anybody else for closing down the houses.
Saw it 1st time in about 1963 when I was 16. Saw it in one of those in-the-round theaters somewhere in LA area. When Jimmy Durante kicked that bucket at the start of the movie I started laughing, didn’t stop laughing till the end. (I’m simple minded suppose)
Good read from Tracy. Thanks for posting.
And thanks for pinging. I was gone over the weekend, but your pings helped me keep up.
Things move so fast here so a ping helps me jump back into the jump rope so to speak.
Aloysius T. McKeever
Huge BOOM! Good job getting it on here!
Q 272
Prayers up, NIKK.
Speedy and full recovery!!
God bless.
Sh*t, I’d settle for a cherry bomb in a toilet today. Something, anything!
CLAS = classified. I like it.
You go to the head of the CLAS!
#Qanon Boards were under attack heavy last night and early this morning. Something big must be getting ready to drop. The clowns know it. It will get out one way or the other. You can't stop us now. pic.twitter.com/cVyhZjFOU2— jaci MAGA (@jackiec57) April 23, 2018
Didn’t the Q message mentioning CLAS also include +3?
Anything to do with the levels? Are these correct?
The U.S. classification of information system has three classification levels — Top Secret, Secret, and Confidential — which are defined in EO 12356.2 Those levels are used both for NSI and atomic energy information (RD and FRD). Section 1.1(a) of EO 12356 states that:
(a) National Security Information (hereinafter “classified information”) shall be classified at one of the following three levels:
(1) “Top Secret” shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security.
(2) “Secret” shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause serious damage to the national security.
(3) “Confidential” shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause damage to the national security.
Roseanne just supposedly tweeted ‘Pi’. As in 3.14 pi.
When was McCabe’ bday again?
Thanks bagster for your kind words. We’ll see how it goes.
That British document showed up about a month ago.
At the time it was debunked. Or possibly “debunked”? They got Steele’s first name wrong and and said he was MI5, but he was MI6.
I am not saying that it’s genuine, but I am not so sure that is enough to debunk it. Here are my reasons:
1. Just because there is a mistake in a document, that doesn’t mean that the document is fake. People make mistakes all the time. I doubt they have editors and fact checkers going over this stuff and fixing all flaws before it goes out.
2. How do we really know that he was MI6 and not MI6? Can you be both? Maybe the MI6 public info is a lie? Who knows? So many lies flying around these days.
3. If the name is not a mistake, how do we know that he doesn’t have an alias or something? Do you really think the last occupant of the WH was named BHO?
My 2 cents’ worth.
Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.