There are still a few around I believe.
Posted on 05/10/2018 7:08:44 AM PDT by MtnClimber
There are still a few around I believe.
Wondering why the propellers on the front plane are shaped like that, while the props on the following planes are of a more “typical “ design
We need to bring back our A1 Skyraiders and rebuild our A10 fleet...or hell, start new production. Super Tucano’s should be given to border states to repel illegals.
America’s police and crowd control tools for the many small wars of the future.
The front plane is likely a turbo-prop engine that sports a different prop design.
30mm’s are high explosive. .50 Cal are not with one exception.
Stinger is supposed to only be good for aircraft under 11K feet. S-400, on the other hand, would be bad news for any aircraft.
Thanks to all posters and linkers. BUMP!
Heya USMCPOP, hope all is well...thanks for the link!
Gotta love it Frick'n Laser Beams.
All J variants of the C-130 use six bladed "scimitar" shaped blades on their turboprops for higher thrust, better efficiency, and lower cruise fuel consumption.
https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/propeller-variable-pitch-6-blade-dowty-r391
The aircraft in the background are older C-130s using a more conventional four bladed prop.
The older gunships have 20mm vulcan canons which are more effective than .50 BMG at the ranges being used by gunships. The older gunships also have a 40mm Bofors canon. The .30mm canon is supposed to fill the gap between the two and do double duty.
However, the Bushmaster .30mm chain gun as deployed on the C-130J has very serious accuracy and reliability issues that have yet to be sorted out, so the gun is pretty much worthless in combat at this time.
Shrunk down to post. Download and it's much larger.
AC-130s won’t be sent (knowingly) into the S-300/S-400 SAM envelope. They carry a very good ECM suite, but you don’t want something with the RCS of a gunship in the heart of an advanced SAM threat. ECM should be effective against an old threat like the S-200/SA-5. Obviously, the gunship is most effective in a “permissive” air defense environment where light/medium AAA and MANPAD SAMs are the primary threat.
Worth remembering we lost an AC-130 in first Gulf War; aircraft commander was relatively new and very aggressive; elected to remain on station after sunrise (very rare for a gunship) and keep pounding the enemy. An SA-14 (MANPAD) brought down the aircraft; entire crew was lost.
Also recall an AC-130 operating over Bosnia during the Balkan operation in the ‘90s that got quite a scare, and wound up with aircraft being grounded for months. The scare came from an SA-6 lock; the mobile SAM system was the biggest concern for most of us flying overland. Not that the SA-6 was a world-beater; by that time, it’s capabilities were well known and various ECM programs were effective against it. But as a mobile system, could pop up literally anywhere and take a shot in its optical mode. Radar warnings would be very late, making it tougher to defeat the threat.
On the night in question, the AC-130 was flying over northern Bosnia when its radar warning receiver (RWR) lit up like a Christmas tree. Indications suggested the gunship had been locked up by an SA-6 Straight Flush target tracking radar (not sure if they received missile launch signals). While the ECM pod did its magic, the AC began maneuvering the aircraft in an attempt to break radar lock. In the process, he over-G’ed the AC-130. The plane made it back to its base in Italy, but it required a lengthy inspection and repair effort to get it back into the air.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.