To clarify - as I read + understood the suggestion from the origin of the identity “Q” at the time (last year) - some considered that there is a reference to “Q” books akin to the Book(s) of Enoch. There was never any lineage purported or stated but, rather, reading “Q” is like reading the other concurrently written works at the time of those books actually incorporated into the Bible - like a ring side seat. The settled upon interpretation, however, “Q-Anon” = “Q level security clearance”.
Yup, that all sounds right. Now I will still have to go back and see what those minimalists came up with for their unholy theory. However, it can wait.