Calling all FreeQs; I have an observation I would like to share. I may be accused of over generalization with this but please hear me out.
I have been noticing how the real, the ugly, the hurtful trolls and yes even the questionable types who want to divide we FreeQs, have a common flaw in their arguments against us and against Q. They all use the fake news correspondents dis-information presented to the masses by the lame stream media. Whether they use information that is created by doublespeak, whitewashing, spin, deception by omision or commission, or outright lying they try to use it to refute ours and Q’s position.
Jack Black is just the latest example. The claim used against Q and our current administration and President inclusive is that those captured were not the top five ISIS leaders. Really! Who told JB that? Where did JB get the information to infer that Q and the President were wrong. IIRC Enlightened1 employed the same tactic when posting on our threads. (PS. The real, hurtful trolls, filled with all their ugliness, do the same.)
Nowhere in JB’s post #9 did I read anything about the information regarding an ISIS leader having been captured earlier. Then we learned his cell phone was used to lure the other terrorists out of Iraq and be captured as they entered Syria. So who is to say those weren’t the correct numbers 1 to 5 of the ISIS hierarchy? So who’s information is right? Can we trust the MSM? Can we trust the President or Q by proxy?
I will tell you this much, when the President has made a promise to do something he does it. For the latest example, the US Embassy is now in Jerusalem and will be finalized tomorrow, May 14th. Illegal aliens are being deported and the “highways”/routes letting them in are being shut down. By the way, he is still fighting the black hats to get the wall built. Need I go on?
The only thing the MSM has done is to keep Americans divided and make oodles of money off of the bickering. Today they are even worse, the only adequate description for them now is nothing short of pure evil. However, there may be a couple reporters so dumb they can only be described as useful idiots of the left.
When we FreeQs see this method employed why do we even waste our time on their fallacious arguments? Do we think the MSM is somehow valid in any sense of the word? OR have we also been so indoctrinated to their 4th estate bull crap that we “must” give them the time of day? I think not.
To bagster and a few other here; I’m not mad at your taunting the trolls. Just be sure you understand that what you are doing is like trying to teach a pig to sing. It’s a waste of your time, and it annoys the pig.
The individuals that come here to disrupt and criticize aren’t worth my time. The information they bring isn’t worth a plug nickel. I believe the appropriate action for FreeQs when they try to ‘do their thing’ is ignore them. Being ignored is what really sticks in their craw.
Disclaimer: I want everyone to know the only reason I am putting JB’s and E1’s name to this post is because they have a right to know I commented about them, but it wasn’t actually to them.
Okay, I’m done with my little exercise, or rant or whatever you want to call it. Whew, and now back to playing catch up.
WWG1WGA
I am not against “our current administration and President”. That’s wildly incorrect. I was supporting Trump when half of FR was on the Cruz train.
The claim you got “the top 5 ISIS leaders” if you didn’t get the top guy is really a basic insight, based on simple logic. It’s not based on MSM sources. The link I put in my post (notice, I do that all the time. Protip: try using links to things in your posts so they have some factual content and not just spew) is from Wikipedia, for people who may not know who the leader of ISIS is. (You seem like you probably fit in that category, Ace.)
My simple point is not based on any “fake news correspondents”. I’ve actually spent a lot of time learning about ISIS, including the supreme importance of the leader and his role of Caliph to their world view and jihadi ideology.
I notice you don’t back up your personal attack on me (again, unnecessarily invective filled) with any quotes, either. Sad.
But you accuse me of lying. LYING? For saying that the Top 5 isn’t the Top 5 just because some reporter said so.
It’s more name calling, and no facts.
Go to hell, Orc.
*****
I bet that ISIS itself doesn't keep a numerical hierarchy list and if you asked them who the "top five" leaders of their organization were, they couldn't tell you. To talk about the "top five" leaders therefore is to be somewhat hyperbolic. It is acceptable form of hyperbole, though. Most likely, the five captured raggedy men ARE important leaders of ISIS. Top five? Who cares. Important leaders? I care.
Like you say, the media, the left, the deep state, and the trolls will latch onto ANY detail that they can take out of context or twist the meaning of to discredit the messenger and therefore the message. It is Alinsky.
Bagster
The Lesser Oracle
...all use the fake news correspondents dis-information presented to the masses by the lame stream media.
____________________
Agreed, Kalam.
I think people want to have MSM validation so they can rub it in the noses of the progs. I know folks who only listen to the top of the hour (CBS) news brief on talk radio....they go ballistic at the misinformation because that is all the normies ever hear. They live for the chance to count coup on the blue-pilled.
It’s not happening, of course, but I think that is the motivation.