Posted on 05/19/2018 11:38:32 PM PDT by ransomnote
At this point, anyone the President can trust in that position would do wonders!
I believe so, as well. Wray works for Rubenstein. Hard to tell where he is in this.
Q
I saw that commercial the other day. Funny!
#537
What ROLE might TG be walking into?
Dunno. At the time I thought he might be in line for some Execuive branch prosecutorial position. Maybe even A.G. itself. Now, maybe this #3 slot. But he would have to face confirmation. Maybe acting pending confirmation? I would like that, myself. I trust Gowdy, though I know some around these parts don't.
Bagster approves of Gowdy.
1 vote Aye.
Bagster
Lesser Oracle
Well, if you view NYC as the quintessential microcosm of humanity and its evil predilictions, Rudy and CINC know all about that. Just expand the scope to cover some other cultures, and you have the model to bring down any crime ring, including the deep state. CINC just had to step his feet into the DC swamp to get a read on their language/culture of crime.
I got WAY more follicles than my baldhead cousin. This is his theme song.
The Bagster family is diverse. We also love ideas.
(See tagline for further information.)
Bagster
Lesser Oracle
See 5 USC 3345(a)(3)
or (3) notwithstanding paragraph (1), the President (and only the President) may direct an officer or employee of such Executive agency to perform the functions and duties of the vacant office temporarily in an acting capacity, subject to the time limitations of section 3346, if--
WH said this was fake news. I read at the time she left for the money.
The Senate voted 52-46 along party lines on Thursday to confirm Rachel Brand to the No. 3 position at the Justice Department.
Ms. Brand, who has previously served in both the White House and the Justice Department, was confirmed as associate attorney general — making her the first woman to hold the job.
Democrats opposed her confirmation, questioning whether she could remain unbiased in her role given her prior work defending business interests at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/may/18/rachel-brand-confirmed-senate-associate-attorney-g/
Citizens, yes.
But not necessarily natural born citizens.
FBI reports to the DOJ.
I’m no lawyer, Cboldt is one of the experts here on legal issues. My understanding is based on the information below.
§ 600.1 Grounds for appointing a Special Counsel.
The Attorney General, or in cases in which the Attorney General is recused, the Acting Attorney General, will appoint a Special Counsel when he or she determines that criminal investigation of a person or matter is warranted and -
(a) That investigation or prosecution of that person or matter by a United States Attorney’s Office or litigating Division of the Department of Justice would present a conflict of interest for the Department or other extraordinary circumstances; and
(b) That under the circumstances, it would be in the public interest to appoint an outside Special Counsel to assume responsibility for the matter.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/600.1
It seems to indicate that a criminal investigation is warranted. What was the suspected crime? Also, the investigation began as a counter-intelligence effort. So it seems that the appointment of Mueller didn’t have the basis needed, and now they are searching for the crimes after the fact. Although, I would wonder who at the Justice Department at the time would not have had a conflict of interest.
Anyone please feel free to correct me. My question is, if the appointment of Mueller could be challenged, why hasn’t it been?
Thank you!
Making a lot of money. Both she and her husband are conservatives.
Aha, that is very interesting. ThankQ.
How about this: Rosenstein out, Trump appoints for 210 day’s, Gowdy then appointed.
I think I grok enough to get by now, thanks!
Okay, next time I won’t bite my tongue.
How about an illegitimate faggot doper commie mozlem racist whitey hating fraud?
In principle, the SC is under the thumb of whoever appointed SC, usually AG, in this case DAG becuse sessions is properly recused from "investigating himself." (he was on the campaign that is being investigated).
Morrison v. Olsen if you want to dig into the details, but it's a waste of your time. Levin is just keeping things interesting for his audience, which is getting impatient.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.