Was woman who verified BHO's birth certificate's murder caught on camera?

[MNDude]

A medical professional who verified Obama's birth certificate with 8 other people was in a plane crash into the ocean in 2013. Donald Trump tweeted the following about this at the time.

"How amazing, the State Health Director who verified copies of Obama’s “birth certificate” died in plane crash today. All others lived"

One of the other passengers was wearing a go cam video camera during the entire time. A news station played a few seconds of this video. In the video, you can see Ms.Fuddy, the health director safe and alive holding onto an airplane wing. Then it appears that a frogman, wearing a scuba diving suit emerges from the water and approaches her.

Many times Trump knows more about an event than he lets on when he mentions it. Remember the wiretapping comment? Remember the comment about pervert Anthony Weiner having access to classified material?

Watch the video in slow-motion yourself.

https://youtu.be/9v636AlaVmE

[rx]

"The head is clearly the same person."
That's really quite humorous, Flagrante! In the top video frame, Fuddy's head is not to be see. In the second, we see only red hair sticking out to the right of the Deputy Director (DD). The known Fuddy's hair is seen elsewhere in the scenario, but it doesn't look at all like the hair belonging to the Replacement Diver's wig.

In the top image, the DD's life jacket isn't even touching the top of the water. We know, however, that when the DD's weight rests on his life jacket, it fully contacts the surface of the water, thusly:


Your embarrassing conjectures about the shoes of the two different people seen at the DD's side:
"The shoes have the same pattern of dark panels and light ribbing. The edges and ribs look bigger because of lateral motion blurring and a slight defocussing in that frame."
... are, well, just embarrassing.

You: "if there were any sponsors"

Yes, there were "sponsors," who provided this camouflaged, undeniably high-tech, classified SEAL Team component of an underwater network. How do you account for this piece having gotten to the crash site within mere moments of the impact?

You: "No Ninja frogmen required"

Well, yes what is captured on video is the undeniable evidence of frogmen that were present.

[rx]

Your image (top) was Photoshopped and does not show the back side of Fuddy's head as you stated. The lower image, not Photoshopped, but only rotated and cropped from the original video frame, allows sufficient resolution to see that it was Fuddy's head from the front that is shown in it.

[Fred Nerks]

The result of which clearly shows that Fuddy was near the door of the aircraft and Yamamoto was beside her. And the woman holding onto the wing,whom many here have identified as Fuddy, wasn't her.

One person near the aircraft door is wearing a fully inflated adult vest, the other isn't. And see whose purple patterned on white background jacket the person on the right of the doorway is wearing...

Neither image as been tampered with, the second is simply somewhat enlarged and cropped.

[Fred Nerks]

That ‘probable health status monitor & communications gear’ looks awfully like she was wearing a shoulderbag...

Hairlines are inclined to suffer styling defects when the head has been affected by wind and doused by waves...

‘Extraneous material’ appear to be reflections on the surface.

[Fred Nerks]

How do you account for this piece having gotten to the crash site within mere moments of the impact?

Question:

I could ask you the same question. Show me.

[Fred Nerks]

http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/slideshow?widgetid=99344

if you care to click through what remains of the salvage images, you’ll find the items you refer to as illustrations of evidence of frogman activities, are items from the aircraft brought up in the salvage operation. One appears to be the exhaust attachment torn from its fuselage fastening, the other would more likely have been part of the luggage compartment interior.

[Fred Nerks]

...and as for the people in the water you maintain are standing on the bottom, not floating, let me suggest you get yourself dropped into the ocean at the same location and see if you can stand up. Show good faith in your theory by NOT wearing a lifejacket, I dare you.

[rx]

Such gibberish and misinformation you've typed here, while avoiding the problems I noted in my post #222!

Your image was clearly Photoshopped (or similar image-editing software)! Here are two of the affected portions of the image, first your altered version and secondly, my cropped original. These changes and the claims you've made surrounding them are very significant.

Now, most FReepers here know you to be a very capable person, so I'm sure the import of my comments in #222 didn't escape your proper notice. Thus, I have to take it to mean that your avoidance of the following clearly-discernible facts was purposeful. This suggests you intend to persist in your attempts to muddy the waters of what was discernible from the NTSB evidence as you continued to read falsehoods into the record:

  1) Your image was Photoshopped, an unfortunate fact you tried to hide both in your original post and in #223, despite my having pointed it out as someone's potential deception. An apology would have been appropriate if your mistake had been unintentional.
  2) The image portion showing two people next to the open starboard rear plane door contains the front of Fuddy's head at right, where she is wearing fully-inflated adult life jacket. I called your attention to my original image where Fuddy's face was clearly visible, since it had not been Photoshopped. You did not acknowledge that my non-Photoshopped image made the identification of her face clear, and that Fuddy was indeed wearing a fully-inflated adult life jacket. The Photoshopped versions you presented manifested clearly-altered images and artifacts not accountable to a lower resolution or mere fuzziness (see down-turning parallel lines to the right side of the door and to the left of Fuddy's face). Someone had intentionally made alterations that made the identification of individuals and life jackets type difficult, with which you fell right into line, even if you didn't do the Photoshopping yourself. In other words, though you're quite capable at recognizing photo alterations and the import of Fuddy's presumed "stress-related" cause of death, you purposely obfuscated that Fuddy's face had been facing the camera lens in my non-Photoshopped original and that she was wearing a fully inflated adult life jacket, all of which was obscured in the Photoshopped image you presented.
  3) You avoided a) which person was Fuddy, b) that the non-Photoshopped version shows that her face is toward the lens. not the rear of her head as your wrongly stated, and c) that it is the Deputy Director at left in the original frame d) who is also wearing an adult life jacket, though it might appear possible that only one of the chambers on his life jacket was filled, meaning e) that of those two people, only on Yamamoto's life jacket could there have been one unexpended CO2 cartridge at the time, f) but not Fuddy's as the NTSB would later claim in their official report.
  4) The images of JK sitting on the wing fiddling with a life jacket has had the features of his face Photoshopped out in your version, where those features remained un-edited in my original, cropped version. Misidentification of plane passengers is a consistent, purposeful feature of the passenger-author's book on The Fuddy Hoax. He would have known better, as the passengers kept in contact with one another long after the crash.

The fact that the NTSB report states it was Fuddy's life jacket that had an unexpended CO2 cartridge plays very unusually (since it relies on testimony from third-party passengers regarding Fuddy's presumed mental state that supposedly led to her claimed cause of death) and significantly plays into the entire narrative, as it was claimed that she wore an only partially-inflated infant life jacket in which there was an unexpended CO2 cartridge. It was those features that were claimed to have caused her stress and to hyperventilate, setting off the "acute cardiac arrhythmia" that was claimed to have been her cause of death.
These are inexplicably altered facts in opposition to the evidence! They do flow from the misrepresentations you've made, while the truths, by contrast, the non-Photoshopped version of this picture make clear the scenario could not have happened as the NTSB report claimed!

A) Fuddy did not at least start out wearing an infant life jacket.
B) Fuddy's life jacket did not have an unexpended CO2 cartridge,
C) Surely Fuddy would have reviled at someone trying to remove her life jacket to give her an only partially-filled, tight-fitting infant life jacket!
D) Could someone have done the life jacket switch after Fuddy would have fallen unconscious? That would have to spell murder, but if there was even a chance she'd been murdered, the Maui County Police dismissed it without leaving any record of considering it as a possibility.
E) If Fuddy's life jacket was never changed out, who made the false representation to the NTSB that a dead Fuddy wore an infant life jacket left with an unexpended CO2 cartridge?

The rest of the Freeper public here will do well to reread the four most recent posts of this exchange to see what NF has nefariously done.

[rx]

What I've pointed to as misappropriated SEAL Team components have already been identified, just as what I've represented, by people that have worked with and continue to work with such equipment. Your childish attempts at disinformation cannot undo the facts. Your behavior here is a discredit to patriots and the truth.

Bought any fields of blood with your pieces of silver while Butter's husband struggles mightily?

Deal with it:

[Fred Nerks]

... by people that have worked with and continue to work with such equipment...

Then let them come here and tell us all about it. So far all you've got is 'they said'.

And butter's husband struggles mightily has nothing to do with Loretta Fuddy and an aircraft ditching off an island in Hawaii.

NTSB REPORT

Examination of the Pratt and Whitney Canada (PWC) PT6A-114A engine revealed that “multiple compressor turbine (CT) blades were fractured and exhibited thermal damage”.

Close Up of Fractured Compressor Turbine Blades - Note Post Ditching Corrosion (Credit: NTSB) Close Up of Fractured Compressor Turbine Blades – Note Post Ditching Corrosion (Credit: NTSB)

Impact marks were found on the CT shroud consistent with the liberation of one or more of the CT blades. The NTSB believe the thermal damage, which precluded conclusive determination of the cause of the blades failures, was secondary and due to the engine fuel control unit increasing the fuel flow in response to the sudden loss of compressor speed when the blades failed.

[Fred Nerks]

blah blah blah...verbosity proves nothing.

quantity doesn’t make quality.

[rx]

It’s pretty clear you don’t know whereof you speak.
Bye!

[Boogieman]

“Hence that seems to negate the hypothesis that she would have had to labor heavily to stay afloat.”

Well, it would if that was actually Fuddy on the video. Problem is, that turned out to be a completely different person in the “frogman” video. That information was discovered within a couple days of this theory coming out.

[4Zoltan]

Hi guys - this crap again.

“B) Fuddy’s life jacket did not have an unexpended CO2 cartridge,”

She could inflate both cells in the jacket without using either of the the CO2 cartridges.

From the maker of the vest:

“Manual CO2 Inflator and an Oral Inflation Tube in each Buoyancy Cell.”

Website that sells the vest - note the same model number as Fuddy’s (IN-V20L8)

https://pilotshq.com/eam-infant-life-vest-5yr-insp-p0640-101-v20l8-p-10416.html?gclid=CjwKCAjwopTYBRAzEiwAnU4kb01UoIqOQFgRUa7NWZluCXXHPZO5Y0EDV5QPJ0wiPZPme9kB56E5QxoC6XsQAvD_BwE

So maybe she inflated one of the cells using the Oral Inflation Tube.

[4Zoltan]

What is the scale of the object in your blown up image?

Here is the same object from a different frame of the movie.

And a blow up from that frame:

When Puentes is leaving the plane you see the gopro hang by a strap around his neck. Later as he is holding onto the wing the strap is in his left hand. Shortly after that it is floating away from him.

[Fred Nerks]

There’s more chance of that than an inflated dummy being on the aircraft to be substituted for Fuddy who was whisked away by divers from a submarine, and a wax model was placed in her coffin...which no one at the funeral noticed.

I saved this from a previous thread:

To: rx

You want me to delete all your posts then? We’re mot going to have any copyright hassles here. Posters who threaten legal action get banned and their posts nuked.

498 posted on - AM by Jim Robinson

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3428362/posts?page=21

I had really hoped we had seen the last of rx - who is using FR to plug his ridiculous video.

[4Zoltan]

My Mistake. In the plane the GoPro was not around his neck but was around his right forearm. The camera has a black attachment that might be a quick release for his stick.

[4Zoltan]

It seems like every piece of “evidence” has been shown to be wrong.

[rx]

So you and Fred have your respective fuzzy and Photoshopped images where I have shown sharp and non-Photoshopped images of the same objects, yet you'd like Freepers to accept your conjectures about what you think you see from those over what anyone else can more clearly seen without what someone tried to obfuscate with photo editing software. I see. Others as well can see that's not a Go Pro and its strap. It's POPPYCOCK!

Furthermore, it's clear your tact is to plead with the board owner to shut down honest presentation and conservative-oriented discussion of factual data and reasoning. Those are anything but conservative modi operandi. I'm confident the conservative Freepers around here will see all these behaviors and make good choices. I don't worry about the things you might say, so as to expend any effort whatsoever to shut down what you say; why don't you try the same?

My images are not taken from my own video as you've suggested with your post. They were taken right from the official NTSB source evidence and not pre-processed by some TV broadcaster, HawaiiNewsNow or the Huffington Post.

I've contributed in the range of $1000 over the years to the funding of this site. I've always been a supporter of conservative values.

[4Zoltan]

Here is another image of the Puentes' GoPro and strap. Note the wavy pattern on the strap and the buckle.

You see the buckle and the same wavy pattern on the high-tech, classified SEAL Team component in the image posted by rx.

Think they'll recall their sold books and edit that crap out? LOL