“I have yet to find anyone who can prove his statistics false or his methodology any more flawed than that of the insurance industry - who have apparently reached the same conclusions of risk re these dogs.”
That statement is patently false and I challenge you to back it up with facts.
To be clear: You cannot.
If it were true, no homeowner would be able to get insurance on their dwelling or their rentals and this would have been litigated to death in the courts years ago.
I’ve attempted to inject some sanity into this pathetic debate about banning a breed, but I get stabbed in the eye no different than on other matters because I am an independent.
People are the problem and you’ve stated as much in your own comments. It is not a priority for any politician to push for legislation on regulating puppy mills.
Oh, NO. In my state it’s a greater priority to ban the trade of wood stoves in the interest of air quality.
If you really want to make a difference - obviously you have a dog in the fight (no pun intended) - you’ll adjust your approach. If not, relish in the fact that all you’re accomplishing here by repeatedly posting one-sided media reports on the effects of human failure is overwhelmingly inflaming an emotional reaction with a distinct minority being any cogent discussion on the causes whatsoever.
Thank you.