[ransomnote]

Thank you for the latest excellent edition of the Oracle - I found it interesting and helpful.

I especially liked your IDEN idea (Q drop #1570). I couldn't get the wiki link in the Oracle to work for me (has my subscription lapsed?) but looked it up on Wiki per your publication:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDEN

I like it because I have been wondering what has been happening with the MSM's "4am talking points." There was a law enforcment raid on Newsweek's Manhattan office building a while back; the MSM didn't report on it much. There were Twitter photos and citizen accounts of activity that appeared to support the story well. Here's one news outlet's account of the raid: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/manhattan/newsweek-office-manhattan-raided-computer-servers-article-1.3765297

Speculation in the Q community swirled, wondering if the white hats or black hats in government had taken an interest in those servers. I never heard if those were Project Mockingbird's 4am talking point servers. I think the MSM helped make sure I and others never heard much about it on the Deep State networks.

I had wondered, if Q knew that there WERE 4am talking points, when the white hats would interrupt that line of swamp communication.

I do recall one day when FReeQs were reporting that the flow of talking points seemed to have been interrupted one morning; the network talking heads were clueless (what a shock) and floundering independently without someone to coordinate "the narrative" for them (I can't remember the date). But the MSM drifted back into a creepily unified wall of (dis)information by evening.

So when I saw "IDEN" in today's Oracle, I wondered if THIS was the new delivery system for the MSM's 4am talking points. I think it may work well with the Q drop lines surrounding it:

Narrative change critical.
IDEN talking points.
Distract IG report / hearings / Korea.

The only sad thing about reading The Oracle at 4:30am is knowing that I won't have a paper waiting for me when I wake up to start the day. :(

[bmwcyle]

Q said to trust Sessions, trust the IG. How is that working out for us all?

[bmwcyle]

Q said to trust Sessions, trust the IG. How is that working out for us all?

[bmwcyle]

Q said to trust Sessions, trust the IG. How is that working out for us all?

[cgbg]

the flow of talking points seemed to have been interrupted one morning; the network talking heads were clueless (what a shock) and floundering independently without someone to coordinate "the narrative" for them (I can't remember the date). But the MSM drifted back into a creepily unified wall of (dis)information by evening.

There was a SF novel in the 1960s about an artificial intelligence robot that was very convincing. The robot's job--report the "news".

We might as well be there now--no need for humans to read Mockingbird talking points.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

A little chaff regarding MMeadows statement about the document showdown:

My opinion is that this statement was actually the committee telling [RR] to provide the dox by 10am TODAY because at 10:01 they WILL file the already prepared impeachment files.

It ^may^ also come to pass that, as the House takes up the debate concerning that impeachment, “THE EO” will be entered into the FedReg and placed on top of the unredacted documents requested by the cmte. This, to be delivered to the House in an effort to get the House back to doing the business of the people.

This will lead to the firing of RR, leaving him open to Federal arrest as his crimes were perpetrated in DC.

More delish to come? Rosey doesn’t look like the kind to swallow the CN-pill to protect anyone. He’ll probably hire the recently unemployed Robert Mueller to defend him while RM still has standing before the bar!

[ichabod1]

Your post brings up a couple of thoughts. What if the WHs were able to IDEN the talking points server, not just the server but the network that produces them, and gained the ability to shut it off. Would they do that or would they leave it open for intelligence? Would they start to slip their own disinformation into the queue? The possibilities seem endless.

[wastedyears]

I like it because I have been wondering what has been happening with the MSM's "4am talking points." ... Speculation in the Q community swirled, wondering if the white hats or black hats in government had taken an interest in those servers. ... I do recall one day when FReeQs were reporting that the flow of talking points seemed to have been interrupted one morning; the network talking heads were clueless (what a shock) and floundering independently without someone to coordinate "the narrative" for them (I can't remember the date).

Those people are evil, and stupid in a general sense, but I don't think they'd have a centrally-located server for Mockingbird, either sender or receiver. Some of them go to school for 5, 6, 8 years to learn multiple aspects of IT; I honestly don't think they'd overlook that.