Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Hostage
My post was about the author's interpretation of Q's posts, nothing else. It had nothing to do with terrorism or countermeasures. Of course those are necessary, but they have nothing to do with Q, the video creator, or my criticism.

The author is concluding that Q already has control over commercial airline networks, based on a few cell phone photos and cryptic remarks.

Is that reasonable?

75 posted on 07/03/2018 1:46:03 PM PDT by Widget Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Widget Jr

I for one completely believe that an anonymous Internet entity known as Q already has control over the commercial airline networks. Makes perfect sense.


78 posted on 07/03/2018 1:49:32 PM PDT by Dagnabitt (Point at the Q Tards and Laugh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: Widget Jr

When he refers to Q, he is talking about an individual that is part of Trump’s intel team.

Q = Trump Intel or USSS detail

Why Q?

Because the President doesn’t trust the liar media.

Why does the President tweet?

If the President were to tweet what the Q group drops with the Anons, what would result?

Would the President be accused of violating National Security?

Or any members of his team?

Why does Q tend to post with speculations? Questions?

Asking questions is a way to convey info without drawing accusations of leaking.

Q’s purpose is to inform what’s going on behind the scenes without losing cover.

I was, as many were, a skeptic initially. Then, bit by bit I saw the data could only be from a legit source, confirmed over and over and over again.

The knuckleheads that act as trolls to these type threads have not done their due diligence. Or they are paid or coerced trolls. Crowdstrike, Defango, etc. are paid trolls. There are also AI trolls used by them to create the appearance of large numbers when in reality, it’s very few.

Q is a group. Some of the Anons are part of the Q group. The skit is to have Q the teacher respond to his ‘students’ the Anons. The Anons have their “Aha!” moments where they appear to speculate what Q is saying. The Anon inferences can only be legally held as speculations, therefore not actionable in court. But the Anons write the information for the public following to read and digest. This is how the picture emerges of what the deep state is doing.

The commentator is reading verbatim what an Anon has written.

Who is Q? No one outside of the President’s circle knows. Anyone saying they know who is Q is a liar or fool.

To say Q “has control” is similar to saying General Kelly has control. Q is obviously high ranking and ingenious. It could very well be General Kelly or someone close to him. But that’s speculation only.


83 posted on 07/03/2018 2:09:01 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson