The left only has random acts of violence that the right simply doesn’t react to. They are like the little yip yip dog constantly attacking and nipping at the large dog who just wants to enjoy a nap. There comes a time that the big dog finally has enough and pounces upon the annoyance, and the brave yip yip dog scurries away whining and crying
The right has the guns, and the discipline. When the right is forced to act, the cowards on the left will learn the definition of shock and awe.
“They are like the little yip yip dog constantly attacking and nipping at the large dog who just wants to enjoy a nap.”
Yep. Or like jackals nipping at a lion:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfHAiIq-Yeo
We were able to fight in 1776 under legitimate authorities. The colonial governments raised troops and patriots mustered in not only under a view of moral right and patriotic duty, but obedience to legitimate law.
We fought in 1861 under legitimate authority. In the south, people felt that their state governments had the authority to raise troops to repel invasion. In the north, people felt that the president had authority to raise troops to put down what amounted to another whiskey rebellion. As Washington did, so Lincoln can do.
Whether one agrees with either of these ideas or not is irrelevant. My simple contention is that our side WILL NOT fight outside of legitimate constituted authority.
I do not see how this can happen in our current society. Sure a few hotheads here and there will maybe lynch some leftists, and sure there will be some self-defense incidents, but that is not civil war and it will not make any real difference.
I invite correction, please.