Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster

Why do planefags sleep at night?

Here’s my wheels-not-wings attempt at #1869. Can anyone shake a planefag awake at this hour to help me figure it out?
___________________
Calculate probability.
What is the mathematical probability that a rogue missile launched at/near the runaway plane?

rnote: Rogue missile launch is statistically rare (thankful for that!) and runaway planes are statistically rare (YES!). The probability that those two events would happen in close/direct proximity at the same time is....how-low-can-you-go?

Was he a trained pilot?

rnote: Yes. They call him Dances-with-missiles and he’s good, very good. “Send him and not us,” good.(particularly if not drone operator)

How fast did intercept occur?

rnote: In time - fast. Impossibly fast for coincidence. Good thing that plane had two jets following equipped for the task and in the right place/right time.

Think missile intercept.
Think aircraft.

rnote: This time “aircraft” but first time in drop “plane”. I am guessing aircraft refers to fighter jets capable of missile intercept.

Outside of standard deviation?

rnote: I’m gonna go with “Yes” if Q means, “On any other day, this (whole) event would be unusual.” If he means accuracy of choreography then the actions of all involved could not be coincidence or exceed an exciting margin for error.

Do people travel to islands to [Fish]?

rnote: No need to - water works fine for fishing from a boat and the Puget Sound has lots of that stuff.

How many billionaires own islands?
How many billionaires live on islands?

rnote: Billionaires and I move in separate circles - can’t say. Billionaires are limited in number. Those who own islands are a small subset. Soros, Epstein, Branson come to mind.

[GEO-T]

rnote: refers to Geotracking:Identifying a person’s current, physical location by obtaining GPS data from their smartphones or other GPS-enabled devices. GEO-T identified the billionaire who liked to sit with a homemade rod and reel on the muddy edge of the island to see if he could catch fish for dinner, or else what would he eat?

CLANDESTINE.

rnote: Usually refers to illicit behavior so that’s a swamp litmus test.

rnote: Unfortunately I have no FAA training in crash analysis. That doesn’t stop me from opining that the debris field and (missing) impact crater looks too small for the purported crash. Therefore, I’m not certain the pilot was killed if aboard (where did he really land?). Drone is still possible but in either scenario, pilot was well beyond “video gamer” status.

My theory (yes, I know, but it’s free to play in this casino):
Military operation planned and radio script recorded well ahead of time. Runaway plane ruse provides support for air traffickers to keep the area clear. Cooperation with local air traffic control for pre-recorded fake radio transmission and to clear the airspace where this operation would take place.

What the public heard of this “runaway” plane’s radio transmission was unrelated to the actual communication between the Q400 and the 2 fighter jets because the coordinating pilots and there tiny little margin for error had “stuff, and things” to talk about.

I’m puzzled by the “bait” aspect of the use of the twin prop aircraft. But I like the prior thread proposal that the bait aircraft (Q400) gives the jets an excuse to operate in the area. But “bait” and the Q drop seems to imply that the missile was fired at the twin prop bait craft. Why risk exposing illicit missile launch facility to take down a joyriding twin prop aircraft? Other, smaller things take down aircraft. This makes me think that the island dwellers were trolled (leaks-r-us) to believe that an attempt would be made on their facility by a twin engine plane fitting that description (retrofitted for...dropping something? Or droning something? More intimidating than those cool flares?). So the missile shot would be defensive.

So put the Q-Bait-400 in the air and circle the island with the size of aircraft that can perform that circle/radius but not too small to pose a threat. Here’s where it gets harder: apparently the time it takes to go from standby to missile launch is known. The F-15’s would have to be there at....around just the right time when missile is launched?????? Small commercial airliner could be expected to have chaff and be more maneuverable than a whale sized commercial plane. That sure isn’t much comfort though.

Why wait for missile launch? Why not send something stealth to drop something stealthy? Rules of engagement? Technically we’re a gentle people, not accustomed to hearing fighter jets pass by overhead on their way to bomb a island neighbors into obeying fishing regulations. Ordinarily we send people with clipboards and zoning regulations regarding illicit rogue missile silos to advise homeowners that they’ll need to get a special permit for modern warfare equipment.

So maybe the Q400 “had” to be fired on to trigger rules of engagement? This makes me think GOOD PILOT was flying remotely because otherwise, GOOD PILOTS find it hard to sustain body temperature above room temperature. “There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots, but there are no bold old pilots.” Or was the missile allowed to hit/destroy a drone Q-bait-400? MIght explain the “smallish” debris field and one or two broken trees.

Again, it doesn’t take a missile to take down an aircraft so I think the missile aficionados believed they had to fire to defend the facility from destruction. Or maybe the missile was the cute/compact kind. Like the kind that were said to be concealed in what looks like big rig trailers? Or something embedded? Otherwise, what’s wrong with a perfectly economical shoulder fired rocket?

Missilefags are asleep right now, or they would tell me just how silly I am to think that return fire from one or two F-15 would be targeting missile silo(s) open/exposed because it just fired a missile - this is better than trying to destroy an embedded silo with defensive doors closed (camouflaged?) and reinforced to protect against attack (Open wide and say “AHHHHH”). Yes, there are larger bunker busters but those would rattle the china in homes around the sound, and leave an attractive, memorable crater. To make this work for minimal munitions, missile bay doors/hatches open?

If this supposed missile launch location is the same as the missile launch re POTUS, then the billionaire fisherman would have known that payback was “forthcoming.” Missile silos may not be as portable as some would like. So they had to sit there and try to threaten or plot their way out of it. Or wait it out (the DS is still unaware it’s losing) They could threaten launch on populated area if approached. They were going to run out of MRE’s sooner or later and a billionaire facing Cheeze Whiz and Ritz crackers has nothing left to lose.

Yes, I may be 188% wrong here but if anything, it’s a token of how grateful I am that these pilots are on OUR SIDE. :)

Q


215 posted on 08/14/2018 11:19:44 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

Well, Okay. The missile(s) would not be used to fire at a low flying plane doing acrobatics. Ha! Yeah.

SO Q doesn’t say that the missiles were fired at the Q400. Q indicates conjunction of missile/plane. I believe that ever since they tried to kill POTUS, the billionaire island missile facility has threatened to launch on a population center if approached or if POTUS crosses a red line (release of incriminating data). The launch would be passed off as Russia, Russia, Russia or China hack =WAR). Release of destructive (to black hats) information would do it - they’d threaten with missiles to stop that.

Rather than trigger a missile launch by releasing data, the white hats used a threat (Q400) to trigger that launch at a time F-15’s would be there to intercept? Maybe I’m getting closer. I just don’t see a missile to swat a (low flying) fly and ANY expectation of pilot mitigation at that altitude.

Prior Q drop

“POTUS Opponents Willing to Start a War to Prevent Power Loss”
1847
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
11 Aug 2018 - 12:21:45 PM
How do you prevent the public release of incriminating acts that would forever strip their power away?
How do you BIND the hands of POTUS?
Two-Pronged SITU.
>>Test strength of midterms through private analysis (win/loss ratio)
>>Analysis below key metric w/o chance for recovery - START A WAR.
Think missile(s) accidentally fired.
Against WHO?
Relationships are VERY IMPORTANT.
The SHARING of INFORMATION IS VERY IMPORTANT.
Q


244 posted on 08/15/2018 1:01:44 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Hey Queen!

I’m not a planefag, but I am a KINGfag...I watched a lot of that channel’s videos. One particular thing I saw was the debris field. Actually, it looked like there were 3 fields, and many trees were damaged.

I’m sorry, I don’t have the link, but one of the first Broadcastify ‘casts I listened to had the pilots of the F 15s audio, I think they were Mac 45 and Mack 46. Nothing I heard, from *any* source (and I listened to a lot!) indicates that this was anything other than an Icarius flight.

I still maintain that if something on that island had to be destroyed, the smart way would have been overt, spec ops style.


365 posted on 08/15/2018 8:47:12 AM PDT by blu (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson