“? I’m honestly curious why you are defending a liberal Paris Accord loving organization like NASA?”
You are regular textbook case of logical fallacies. Fallacy of the Complex Question in this case.. which doesn’t mean that your question is complicated, it means that you love to load your questions with presuppositions.
I’m defending the good people of NASA who worked on the Moon program, and whose tremendous accomplishment deserves to be defended against slander artists, whether the slander is motivated by invincible ignorance or malice.
No, you are defending our childhood memories of astronauts on TV, out of a patriotic nostalgia.
But Santa isn't real, and you cannot demonstrate NASA’s actual accomplishments; indeed NASA can't duplicate, and therefore cannot build upon, what they say they did years ago.
And slander exists only if one knowingly and purposely lies.
That any conservative or Judeo-Christian blindly pledges allegiance to any Governmental agency defies the definition of conservatism, and faith in the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob.
Meanwhile, among a myriad list of things that no one has answered about NASA, I'm still puzzled over how they love to write "SEX" in the fake clouds on their faked "earth images", this one from 2015:
