1. He's too much of a political . . . gamer. 2. To whatever degree his Christian persona is authentic, he seems too averse to playing hardball when necessary. 3. I don't think he could motivate the populace 1/10th as well as Trump can. Hope I'm wrong.
Talking about Pence here, right? At this point in time I'm inclined to agree.
I need to find out more about Mark Meadows. His name was bantied around a couple of FreeQ Freads ago as quite possibly having some of the same moxie as Trump and would make a solid follow-on to Trump in 2024.
Meadows was a short-lived candidate as the CoS successor to Kelly, and interestingly his name was removed from the list very quickly with a statement from Sarah Sanders saying that Meadows would be of greater value standing pat:
"“Congressman Mark Meadows is a great friend to President Trump and is doing an incredible job in Congress,” White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said in a statement. “The president told him we need him in Congress, so he can continue the great work he is doing there.”
I personally like the idea of Meadows remaining where he is. He so far appears to be a fighter (ala Jim Jordan OH), and Trumps needs all reliable assets to remain place and carry on.
I do feel quite of bit of empathy to our solid, remaining patriots in the House now having to deal with the Rat majority consisting of yipping hyenas and moronetards. Buuuuuuuuttttt...they're gettin' a pretty good paycheck to deal with it.
yes, need Meadows where he is, holding off Pelosi & Schitt and the other rabid DEMs
Should I connect the WH interest in Meadows for Chief of Staff with the reason Meadows backed away and deferred to Jim Jordan as chair of that Committee, come January?