I find it ironical that you speak of Q as if he's real and at the same time saying that he's not.
AND at the same time spewing more "we're all gonna die" rhetoric.
Honestly, derpish, at this point you're comic relief.
Bagster
I won't speculate on when Q will post again, right now. I don't have any information that would help me make such a prediction.
The Mueller Report, however, I think is being way over-anticipated by a lot of people, for three reasons.
Reason #1: Mueller doesn't appear to be done, just based on what we are seeing happen. He just indicted Roger Stone.
Mueller's track record with every other American he's indicted is that he keeps tightening the screws on them, including threats to their family, and eventually they cop a plea and promise to inform on others. Some keep the pledge and even become enthusiastic rats(Cohen, Gates) and some are not productive as cooperating witnesses, which Mueller punishes by trying to get more time for them (Manafort, Papadopoulos).
It's a damn ugly process, but he consistently uses it. He's just starting in with Stone. Maybe Stone is made of sterner stuff, and will not cave in to Mueller, and we will get a trial. Manafort went that route inititally, and still ended up pleading out to avoid retrial and a second trial on other charges.
Mueller has a number of his rats (pleaded-guilty-now-informants) that he has still not agreed to sentence, too. Flynn was delayed again, Manafort's sentence isn't done either.
Obviously he's hoping to break Stone, and then move on from Stone to ... someone else. (Possibly moving away from the President with someone like Jerome Corsi, but keeping his investigation alive.
Reason #2: It's in Mueller's interest to keep the investigation going as long as possible. The mere existince of his "active investigation" is effectively preventing any evidence helpful to the counter narrative to be made public. It's why Trump, after threatening to release documents around the FISA abuse, abruptly backed down. It's why the long-awaited Office of Inspector General (OIG) report by IG Horowitz is still bottled up. It may even be why Huber hasn't apparently done anything to investigate Deep State antics, as Session's implied he would.
It's clear there is a lot of wrong doing that happened when the Deep State tried to first prevent Trump's election and then hamstring him, and ultimately remove him. An endless investigation that effectively prevents any of those involved from every being investigated (much less indicted) is very, very convenient, to say the least.
Reason #3: No report is required. In contemplating the end of the investigation it's important to be realistic about this fact: nobody can make Mueller end his investigation. Any attempt to do so, by the acting AG, or the hopefully-soon-to-be-confirmed new AG would result in charges of obstruction and howls or outrage, a possible impeachment of the person "interfering", etc.
And, even when he is ready to conclude his investigation we have been told by AG nominee Barr that the only "Mueller Report" he expects is the very typical memo explaining decisions not-to-charge. And DOJ standard procedures are not to release those (for sort of obvious reasons, if the subject of investigations did not in the judgement of the DOJ commit a crime they don't deserve to have details of their lives thrown in the gutter for CNN and their ilk to pick over.)
In other words, this isn't the Starr investigation, it's not being run under that law, which was revoked. There is no statutory requirement, nor justice department policy that requires (or even permits) Manafort blovating about things he merely thinks, but are not crimes.
Put simply: there may not be a report.
Therefore, if Q is waiting for the Mueller Report, it might be a long, long, long time before we hear from him again.
But, I have no reason to believe that Q is waiting for the Mueller Report, or the State of the Union, or anything else. I just don't have any reason to speculate on that.
Just letting you know I never, ever read anything you post.
I find it ironical that you speak of Q as if he's real and at the same time saying that he's not.
AND at the same time spewing more "we're all gonna die" rhetoric.
Honestly, derpish, at this point you're comic relief.
Bagster
Why do you keep cluttering up this thread? I really appreciated that time you posted all in soi green (hey, you know what soylent green is, right? LOL!)...I skipped right over it because:
a. I don't care for what you have to say
b.You go ON and ON and ON...are you really just Bill O'Reilly and are really bored? OH, the question was rhetorical, I would prefer you to not "talk" to me....or anyone here!
#ThursdayNightRealityBites
#HadEnough