Posted on 08/11/2019 2:53:23 PM PDT by ransomnote
I also saw a former guard say that there was a shift change at either 5 or 6am. So there should have been at least one count either at the end or the beginning of the new shift.
The whole thing is so confusing.
There is the idea that Epstein is alive and was taken somewhere else so that (presumably) he can be kept safe and secure for later testimony. I don’t have a lot of faith in this.
But the “excuses” that they roll out for how he died are getting ludicrous. Multiple updates, none of them believable. It’s insulting to our intelligence that they think we will accept these ridiculous stories about failed cameras, sleeping guards, removed cell mates, etc.
It almost seems like they want to sow doubt so that people really do wonder, “Is it all BS? Is he alive? Will he testify later?”
Solomon on hannity last night said he thinks IG report will be out by Thursday
*************
ANALYSIS: Who and what the Horowitz report is likely to cover
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/analysis-who-and-what-the-horowitz-report-is-likely-to-cover
The 448-page report detailing special counsel Robert Mueller’s two-year Trump-Russia investigation is public. Next up: Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report into how that investigation started.
That report, anticipated to be released after Congress returns from August recess, will come amid an ongoing contentious debate between Republicans who think the government unfairly targeted Trump and Democrats who believe Trump deserved to be investigated for his alleged ties to Russia.
But what Horowitz’s report, which is expected to delve into alleged abuse of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and the FBI’s use of the salacious and unverified dossier compiled by British ex-spy Christopher Steele, contains has been held close.
Still, recent developments have offered a sneak preview of the cast of characters who could make appearances when Horowitz explains what his team uncovered.
Former FBI Director James Comey received good news a couple weeks ago when the DOJ decided not to charge him over leaking his memos, despite a criminal referral from Horowitz, who concluded Comey leaked classified information and showed a lack of candor. But the leak inquiry was just a narrow slice of the broader investigation Horowitz launched in March of last year.
Excerpt
Ditto
Powerful.
Prayers for the children.
mark
Not again. Take this nonsense off line.
Yeah, and Trump initially took on John Lewis from Georgia. This was from January 24th, 2017:
.Trump struck back on Twitter, saying that Lewis needed to focus on his congressional district in Georgia, which is in horrible shape and falling apart (not to mention crime infested) rather than falsely complaining about the election results.
Trump said Lewis is All talk, talk, talk no action or results.
I live in the Atlanta Metro area, and nearly everyone had the vapors when Trump fought back. “How dare he criticize and icon of the civil rights movement.!!!!”
Trump is setting the example and in reality already has it established that you CAN go after legitimate targets with criticism and go on to live another day...actually gain support with the “about damned time” crowd.
Some Republicans are seeing this and adopting some boldness. Alas, we still have too many squishes.
Bttt
The Soviet Union ultimately failed because it became literally impossible to tell the truth.
No, I meant ANAL Pete, Pete Butt-edge-edge.
Right on. I was just going to remark how LBJ bragged that he would have those n-words voting democrat for the next 200 years.
They did replace her: They put her and the two bulls on leave pending the results of the investigation. Never fear though, they put another woman, this one with a REAL African sounding name in her place.
Doesn't pass the smell test
A big software co like FB has all the auto programs to make transcripts
:)
Some on this thread have undoubtedly been watching him since before his conviction in 2008.
My first notes on Epstein are from 10/2007.
And...
..you are...
...whom?
You got a snarky question for me, take that question off line.
I suspect that the Red Cross had not yet been tainted in 1918.
One would like to think.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.