Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: alloysteel

“Automatic transmissions used to be such simple things.”

Just go back to ‘50’s Olds 4 speed hydromatic.


58 posted on 12/07/2019 4:15:42 PM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Bonemaker

Agreed, the original Oldsmobile Hydromatic, also used in the Pontiacs and Cadillacs of the time, and licensed out to some other manufacturers, was a highly complex and at times touchy piece of machinery, but remember, it was the first relatively reliable and available automatic transmission for the general public. There were a lot of versions of “semi-automatic” transmissions, that used a fluid drive and a foot clutch, most generally engineered by Chrysler, and involved a four-speed gearbox, but could only upshift because there was a momentary cutout of engine power, by an interruption of the ignition.

It was a big thing when Buick introduced the torque converter and the high-low two-speed planetary in about 1950 or so, with a similar design being used in the Chevrolets a year or so later. Much simpler in design than the original Hydromatic, the design was quickly copied by Chrysler and introduced about the same time.

Ford adopted the Borg-Warner torque converter and three-speed planetary design, for several years, until they engineered their own version. I think Studebaker also used the same design.


89 posted on 12/08/2019 6:01:55 AM PST by alloysteel (Nowhere in the Universe is there escape from the consequences of the crime of stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson