Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Jordan and The Economics of the Coronavirus
EconomicPolicyJournal.com ^ | March 13, 2020 | Robert Wenzel

Posted on 03/13/2020 8:43:27 AM PDT by PPSman

The airwaves and the internet are filled with warnings about the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19). There is more panic in the air than virus itself. The panic is a non-stop viral news dump.

But lost in the hysteria concerning the virus is the fundamental fact that humans rank choices every day, all the time.

Government edicts to deal with the virus are simply various methods to trample over human individual choices. This is economics 101.

Consider, it seems pretty clear that if someone under the age of 65 contracts COVID-19, it generally means a week or so of illness and that's it. Full recovery.

In some circumstances, perhaps many, young and middle-age individuals may want to risk the possibility of getting infected as opposed to missing some important (or unimportant) event. It is about rankings and value scales.

(Excerpt) Read more at economicpolicyjournal.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: coronavirus; covid19

1 posted on 03/13/2020 8:43:27 AM PDT by PPSman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PPSman

Well... at least the coronavirus has gotten everyone past Kobi grief.


2 posted on 03/13/2020 8:45:11 AM PDT by wizardoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PPSman
The author should ask from his college tuition money back, his analysis is fundamentally incorrect.

"In some circumstances, perhaps many, young and middle-age individuals may want to risk the possibility of getting infected as opposed to missing some important (or unimportant) event. It is about rankings and value scales."

No, it isn't the risk of an individual getting sick that matters, it is the external cost on society and others that it causes. Someone who decides, for example, to go to a business meeting when they should be at home isolating themselves may, like the person here in New Hampshire, infect other people. Those people then bear the cost, potentially their lives, of the choice of the person who didn't want to miss an "unimportant" event.

If the person who spread the illness had to pay for the cost of the resulting infections, or bore criminal responsibility, I think the "rankings and value scales" would be quite different.

There are lots of things people don't do not because of the cost to them, but because of the potential cost to others.

3 posted on 03/13/2020 8:56:33 AM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing

Excellent comment.


4 posted on 03/13/2020 12:21:43 PM PDT by Rocky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson