Natural born citizen has not been totally defined. But a later article has defined the situation better:
Article 14 Sec 1:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. So just by being born in Oakland, Ca, she qualifies as a citizen on her own.
This was the reason they had to get Obama born in Hawaii as his birth, in my opinion, and witnessed by his relatives, was in Mombasa, Kenya, and his mother, the only American citizen parent, had not resided in the US for over 4 years, which disqualified him of being a citizen of the U.S. and he would have to had qualified like any other immigrant that was allowed to enter. Interesting that it didn’t make any difference until he ran for president and his birth certificate was “lost.”
rwood
“...Article 14 Sec 1:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside....”
************************************************
I know that you know this but, for the benefit of others who may not, “citizen by means of being born in the USA” does NOT ALWAYS EQUAL the constitutional “natural born citizen”.