They seem to keep finding more fossils with cellular intact components. Ever since Mary Schweitzer first published her findings. Apparently they didn’t think anything like that could remain intact after 60 to 100 million years....one hypothesis is that the specimens may not be that old..degradation kinetics suggest they cannot be that old. Definitely a conundrum for those who cannot refute degradation rates of biomolecules.
I think it’s because the vast
MAJORity died off 65 million years ago. But pockets of survivors held on even into relatively recent time frames where men were fighting dragons.
They seem to keep finding more fossils with cellular intact components.
—
Then again maybe ‘scientists’ are wrong about how long organic material can last to begin with. Simpler explanation. So there is no ‘conundrum’.