Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nikos1121
tin, lead, lumber, grain, salt, gypsum alabaster (what roman and greek statues are made of), livestock/fish, and slaves

Vikings would take blond and redhead English slaves south to sell and finance a career as mercenaries or traders. They were well-known to the Greeks and were called Varangians in the Byzantine era. From the goods taken south to trade, Rome got a good idea of the wealth of resources in England - to Rome, England was their 'new world'. Expansion of the Roman Empire in a crowded Mediterranean was limited, and the only power controlling the assets of the North were the Vikings. And why should the Vikings control it all? So off they went to England, kicked the Vikings out, and began exploiting resources and manpower while collecting tribunes from the tribal leaders.

“Some Scandinavian laws prohibited inheritance for those who had dwelled in Greece, because it was so lucrative.”
https://www.quora.com/Did-the-Vikings-have-anything-to-do-with-the-Greeks

25 posted on 11/27/2021 9:26:33 PM PST by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: blueplum

Thanks for this. Makes sense.

But eventually England was comprised of Saxons who were conquered by invaders from the North, and they conquered back finally uniting England. England did not descend from th Romans.


27 posted on 11/29/2021 6:09:47 AM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson