Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This Is Claimed To Be The Most Aerodynamic Car Ever. But It’s Not...Next time do better research, Chery
Motor 1 ^ | Nov 07, 2023 at 8:32am ET | By: Angel Sergeev

Posted on 11/08/2023 6:02:09 AM PST by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Hot Tabasco

Good idea!..................


21 posted on 11/08/2023 10:50:53 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
My parents had a 62 or 63 Studebaker Lark and the Rosary Beads were in the front, just like mine are now.

We liked the Lark but I remember it did overheat when pulling a travel trailer uphill a couple times. Small block V8.


22 posted on 11/08/2023 11:04:13 AM PST by steve86 (Numquam accusatus, numquam ad curiam ibit, numquam ad carcerem™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Common Sense 101
I believe the AMC Pacer was the most aerodynamic car ever made...

In reverse! OK, not in reverse either, but better than when going forwards.

23 posted on 11/08/2023 11:16:07 AM PST by Moltke (Reasoning with a liberal is like watering a rock in the hope to grow a building.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
The Most Aerodynamic Car Ever?


24 posted on 11/08/2023 1:37:25 PM PST by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Good times


25 posted on 11/09/2023 7:17:17 AM PST by Vaduz (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Aerodynamics isn’t that big a deal. At normal highway speeds, good vs bad aerodynamics might give you ±2-3 mpg. Stacking a bunch of bikes on your roof (terrible!) and hitting 100 mph, you might half your mileage. But most vehicles (even older ones) have enough of a decent aerodynamic design that all you can really do is make small improvements that aren’t that noticeable. Underinflated tires is going to do more damage to your numbers.

And really, would you rather have a badass looking Mustang or Corvette from the 60s (obviously with today’s improved engines and all), or the sleek-ish all-look-alike ones from today? Can a non-car guy even tell the difference between the Camaro or the Charger or the Challenger or even the Mustang?


26 posted on 11/13/2023 7:11:30 AM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

One of my daughter’s boyfriends in HS, early 2000’s, thought our ‘98 Firebird was a Corvette.............


27 posted on 11/13/2023 7:14:37 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson