Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: All; LonePalm

Defense specialist encounters unidentified object ‘going faster than the speed of sound underwater’ while doing classified work on the Navy’s USS Hampton submarine.

Bob McGwire claims he encountered an unidentified submerged object. The scientist was conducting classified work on the Navy’s USS Hampton. He wasn’t told to keep it quiet and said he was ‘blowing this wide open’:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12910629/defense-specialist-unidentified-object-navy-submarine.html


1,205 posted on 12/31/2023 10:24:04 AM PST by Melian (✳✴️ Reminder: Memes are made to make you think or laugh. Verify for yourself before reposting. ✳️✴️)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1204 | View Replies ]


To: Melian; LonePalm

“The onboard sonar determined the unidentified submerged object (USO) was traveling through the water faster than the speed of sound, he has” claimed (spelling corrected).

I’d moar (spelling intentional) information.

The speed of sound IN AIR is about 1,192 km/h; 740 mph; 643 kn at STP (Standard Temp/Pressure).

The speed of sound IN Seawater is about 1,531 km/sec; 5,000 fps; 3409 mph at STP (Standard Temp/Pressure).

Which “Speed of sound” was it breaking?

How did “SONAR” determine how fast it was going using sound to detect, track, and perform target motion analysis on the object?

I wonder what was “said to” and “heard by” the reporter who wrote that.


1,225 posted on 12/31/2023 1:02:52 PM PST by HippyLoggerBiker (Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite and furthermore always carry a small snake. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1205 | View Replies ]

To: Melian; LonePalm

I’ve heard this basic story before. Still don’t know if the writer means speed of sound in water or speed of sound someplace else, like, oh, say air? For him to see/hear that he had to have his ear muffs on or maybe watching a strip chart recorder to have a notion of time and distance. His “research” had to already be listening to something outside since there’s nothing otherwise to “hear” inside a nuke. This genius can’t reveal how he observed the speedy thing without also revealing what he was testing/observing/operating. I still have one hand on the BS flag until we get a couple specifics. Testing hypersonics underwater comes to mind but there is nothing quiet about that bit of hocus pocus?


1,228 posted on 12/31/2023 1:09:01 PM PST by OldWarBaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1205 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson