Ignorant people?
I assume you are ignoring the data from places where masks nor vaccines were mandated related to spread of the ‘disease’. In addition to the data related to vaccine injury that occurred when administered and now long-term impact. mRNA was not a ‘novel’ approach to a ‘novel’ virus. It had failed for over 40 years - the evidence has been there.
Trump had people in the White House telling him these things; instead he allowed his cabinet appointments to stab him in the back instead of take the PR hit on standing on science related to this event.
I find your post alarming considering the subject of the article posted; perhaps you were one that reported people to Twitter/YouTube/Facebook when they stated facts related to the harm of the COVID jab. Considering it is now common knowledge the efficacy rates were total BS - going so far as to pollute the control group in Johnson County Kansas when live testing was taking place - sorry to say this - the live clinical trial was a sham and done on purpose. We had NO ONE standing up for us while the private/public partnerships worked to eliminate cheaper and effective treatments for the ‘disease’. Trump got rolled on this - even though he boasted of taking hyrdoxychloroquine - I consider it too complicated a subject for him to tackle effectively for a good public polling result.
Don’t forget - the elimination of the cheap and effective treatments HAD to be removed from the table - by law the emergency use authorization could not be utilized if ‘horse paste’ was found to work better and safer.
I am referring to those, who with ignorance, imposed rules that did not comply with the science. The failure of the Biden Regime was to ignore the necessity to give the scientific information and failed to use best methods to convey that information to the uninformred public. That allowed charlatans (Frontline Doctors) to take advantage of the uninformed masses and capitalize on unproven methods to fight the pandemic. The misinformation they brought to the public understanding was criminal. It allowed COVID-19 to kill more people when the need was to create herd immunity—not sell Vitamin D and Zinc! Ivermectin and HCQ was a no go!
On the other hand, when we had the Polio epidemic, the public was better informed, thanks to President Eisenhower:
On May 31, 1955, in a statement to the nation, Eisenhower outlined the benefits of the vaccine–which “was found to be 60 to 90 percent–not 100 percent–effective in the field trials last year,” he said–and addressed recent delays in the rollout, though over 5 million children in first and second grade had been vaccinated. He pledged that the rollout would “continue to proceed in a fair and orderly manner,” prioritizing children, and ordered states to provide plans for distribution to the federal government to ensure they were moving accordingly.
Eisenhower hinted that, absent continued cooperation, he would order more government controls, including legislating the vaccine. But since cooperation was the order of the day, that did not appear necessary: “The program will operate in a sure and orderly way, given the full cooperation of the State officials, the manufacturers, the distributors, the medical profession, and the people of the Nation,” the president said. “I am confident that the program will receive that support. For these reasons I do not believe that regulatory legislation in this field is necessary.”