numberonepal wrote:
“
“
I wouldn’t want a psychologist telling me how to file “legal” documents.”
BAR attorneys know nothing of this stuff. Who else would you trust? And that Maricopa Board seemed to respond to Miki Klann. TBD.”
As I said in my previous post, the sovcit filings Do. Not. Work.
Attorneys, judges, officials -do- know about this material, and do NOT find it valid.
Just because one board seemed to respond doesn’t mean all will.
Thus, I will —not— trust the sovcit teachers.
The sovcit proponents are infiltrating the Q/MAGA/grassroots movements, and can do untold damage to them.
Also, the tactic of going after the officials’ bonds is —bond fraud— per the FBI; see this article (mentions Niki Klann):
“...
Apparently inspired by Socha, Klann launched Bonds for the Win. The pitch is simple: public servants must be bonded, and if they do not act in your best interest, you can file a complaint with the bond company, costing them millions of dollars and possibly forcing them to remove the public servant from office. Help them “fight tyranny throughout the world.”
Education officials, insurance companies, and the FBI have all noted that Bonds for the Win’s claims are bogus. The FBI reportedly says that it’s “bond fraud” and it “frequently intermingles legal and pseudo legal terminology in order to appear lawful.” For their part, the Bonds for the Win site is very explicit in saying they are not lawyers, they are not giving you real legal advice, and if you attempt any of this stuff, you do so “at your own peril.” But the combination of legal-sounding language, large money amounts, and an onslaught of paperwork can be intimidating.
The surety bond tactic has been reportedly attempted in 14 states. In Scottsdale, Klann accompanied QAnon influencer Ron Watkins to a board meeting; he railed against “communist school boards” and Klann served the board with papers for an intent to file a claim against their surety bonds.
...”