Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Novel CT exam reduces need for invasive artery treatment
Medical Xpress / Radiological Society of North America / Radiology Cardiothoracic Imaging ^ | April 11, 2024 | Mangun Kaur Randhawa, M.D. et al

Posted on 04/20/2024 1:32:23 PM PDT by ConservativeMind

A study shows that a non-invasive imaging test can help identify patients with coronary artery blockage or narrowing who need a revascularization procedure.

Doctors use coronary CT angiography (CTA) to diagnose narrowed or blocked arteries in the heart. A CTA exam receives a score from mild (0–1) to severe (4–5). Patients with scores above 3 typically require medical treatments.

Doctors have traditionally relied on invasive coronary angiography to image vessels and more recently have added fractional flow reserve (FFR) to identify and assess significant blockages.

To assess CT-FFR, Dr. Randhawa conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent coronary CTA at MGH between August 2020 and August 2021.

During the study period, 3,098 patients underwent coronary CTA. 292 (9.7%) were referred for CT-FFR analysis, and eight were excluded, leaving 284.

As expected, most referrals to CT-FFR were patients with scores of 3 or above. CT-FFR was requested in the majority (73.5 %) of patients with a score of 3 (moderate narrowing/blockage).

"In patients with moderate narrowing or blockage of the arteries, there can be ambiguity about who would benefit from invasive testing and revascularization procedures," Dr. Randhawa said. "CT-FFR helps us identify and select those patients who are most likely to benefit."

Out of the 284 patients, 160 (56.3%) had a negative CT-FFR result of > 0.80, 88 patients (30.9%) had a clearly positive (abnormal) result of ≤ 0.75, and the remaining 36 patients (12.6%) had a borderline result between 0.76–0.80.

Patients with significant narrowing/blockages on coronary CTA who underwent CT-FFR had lower rates of invasive coronary angiography (25.5% vs. 74.5%) and subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention (21.1% vs. 78.9%) than patients who were not referred for a CT-FFR.

Said Brian B. Ghoshhajra, M.D., M.B.A. "CT-FFR makes the CT 'better,' but we found that the benefits were highest when used selectively."

(Excerpt) Read more at medicalxpress.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: arteries; coronaryarteries; coronaryartery; coronarydisease; cta; disease; surgery
It appears CT-FRR, which is generally available, provides outcomes that reduce the likelihood or need for more invasive follow on work.
1 posted on 04/20/2024 1:32:23 PM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mazey; ckilmer; goodnesswins; Jane Long; BusterDog; jy8z; ProtectOurFreedom; matthew fuller; ...

The “Take Charge Of Your Health” Ping List

This high volume ping list is for health articles and studies which describe something you or your doctor, when informed, may be able to immediately implement for your benefit.

Email me to get on either the “Common/Top Issues” (20 - 25% fewer pings) or “Everything” list.

2 posted on 04/20/2024 1:33:07 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

“A CTA exam receives a score from mild (0–1)...”

If 0 gets you a “mild” rating, what score would get you a “clear” rating?


3 posted on 04/20/2024 2:40:46 PM PDT by Magic Fingers (Political correctness mutates in order to remain virulent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I had this procedure.


4 posted on 04/20/2024 2:44:27 PM PDT by Lazamataz (To anyone who also wants to see the Stealth Liberal "joesbucks" banned, contact me by Freepmail. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Who the heck wants to drive all the way to CT just to take an exam? Just kidding!


5 posted on 04/20/2024 2:45:59 PM PDT by Sirius Lee (They intend to kill us. Plan to avoid this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Save! Thanks. May be the next thing on my doc’s list.


6 posted on 04/20/2024 3:08:57 PM PDT by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tunehead54; ConservativeMind

That was a persiflage. Which is apparently a medieval word Webster wants to bring back. Its what you say - as far as I can discern - when nobody got the joke.

Seriously though, thanks for what you do. Life and death stuff. Its appreciated.

;-)


7 posted on 04/20/2024 3:18:45 PM PDT by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I had this procedure.

Can you describe what is involved? How was it?

8 posted on 04/21/2024 2:27:11 PM PDT by chud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson