Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: woodpusher
Just proves birthers who have been recycling this crap since 2008 are retarded. When a State "proves" a State record, that record must, pursuant to the Constitution, be accepted in every court in the United States. That has been going on since 1789.

Hawaii did not produce the actual record. They produced a fabrication and called it a "record."

The framers were not imbeciles. Fake documents are not real documents even if produced by a state. The State has an obligation to produce *REAL* documents.

56 posted on 04/24/2024 9:42:48 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp; woodpusher; butterdezillion
"The State has an obligation to produce *REAL* documents."

The Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) was requested for three Verifications of Barry's LFBC. Those came from the Arizona Secretary of State, the Kansas Secretary of State, and the Mississippi Democratic Party.

All three Verifications produced by HDOH were invalid according to the Hawaii Revised Statutes, despite the fact that the state employees that produced them knew full well how to produce valid Verifications.

My belief is that the Verifications were purposely made to be legally invalid. I believe the legally penalty for producing an invalid Verification is likely far less onerous to those involved in its certifications than would be the penalty for participating a valid Verification that explicitly and literally endorsed the authenticity of false information.

HDOH personnel would have heard the public brouhaha concerning Barry's LFBC and would surely have wanted to avoid personal culpability in the whole mess. I believe that was likely also one of the drivers for "Fuddy" wanting a faked death to exit real life via "The Fuddy Hoax."

57 posted on 04/24/2024 10:16:07 AM PDT by rx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp
Hawaii did not produce the actual record. They produced a fabrication and called it a "record."

Rather than address the applicable law, you provide yuour opinion, disregarding the Constitution and H awaii state law. You are entitled to your opinion, however unfounded it may be.

Your claim at #45 was, "Just proves the courts are full of cowards, ignorant morons, and corruption." Courts do not rule based on your opinion but on the actual law.

It is your apparent position that your opinion takes precedent over the Constitution and Hawaii State law. It doesn't and never has. A document which has been proved by a state is not subject to review for authenticity by the Federal courts.

60 posted on 04/24/2024 3:51:54 PM PDT by woodpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson