Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Reagan and Thatcher would have defeated Putin in Ukraine
The Hill ^ | 5/3/2024 | ROBERT PITTENGER AND OLEG DUNDA

Posted on 05/03/2024 7:35:04 AM PDT by marcusmaximus

A bipartisan majority in the U.S. Congress recently took the noble and necessary action of devoting a fresh round of aid worth $61 billion to Ukraine. Now that the U.S. has stepped up militarily, the West needs to ramp up a line of effort that has been lacking in its Ukraine strategy: intensifying economic warfare. It’s a tactic that President Ronald Reagan and British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher would have embraced — and one that will undermine the Russian military and the Vladimir Putin’s regime’s stability.

Reagan came into office perceiving the Soviet Union’s economic weakness, and resolved early in his presidency to use American economic power to bring down the USSR. In 1982, National Security Advisor William Clark said in a speech, “We must force our principal adversary, the Soviet Union, to bear the brunt of its economic shortcomings.”

Later, the seminal National Security Decision Directive-75 of 1983 articulated the need “to seek to minimize the potential for Soviet exercise of reverse leverage on Western countries based on trade, energy supply, and financial relationships.” Hence, throughout the 1980s the vast majority of U.S-Soviet trade was dominated by agricultural products. American machinery and equipment composed 13 percent of U.S-Soviet trade totals in 1981, but fell to 5 percent by 1985.

Today, the Western war effort is hamstrung by Kremlin leverage over the West in the form of continued oil and gas exports.

-snip-

Sadly, many Ukraine-supporting democracies have not done enough to wean themselves from Russian energy — a work Donald Trump started as president by sanctioning the now-defunct Nord Stream 2 pipeline. Hungary, Slovakia, Belgium, Czechia and France were the largest buyers of Russian fossil fuels within the European Union in February 2024.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: dailypropaganda; lesspropagandaplease; mucusmaximus; propagandaspam; reagan; russia; sovietunion; thatcher; ussr; whatif
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

1 posted on 05/03/2024 7:35:04 AM PDT by marcusmaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: marcusmaximus

Russia would not have moved on Uk with either of them in charge. WHY? Because both of them would have demanded that Uk honor the Minsk agreement they agreed to — before BeijingBiden met with his little toad Zelynsky to reject the agreement. WHY? ‘Cause a war means more $$$ to skim and no stoppage of Uk’s 2nd most profitable industry — sex trafficking.


3 posted on 05/03/2024 7:49:14 AM PDT by bobbo666 (Baizuo, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trumpisourlastchance
Reagan wouldn’t be doing jack sh*t to help Nazi Ukraine.

1. Ukraine isn't Nazi.

2. Yes, Reagan probably would try to help Ukraine.

4 posted on 05/03/2024 7:50:49 AM PDT by Angelino97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

Article should be about China, not russia.


5 posted on 05/03/2024 7:51:32 AM PDT by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

Here comes the Putin worshippers...lol


6 posted on 05/03/2024 7:52:24 AM PDT by rrrod (6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

The authors are charlatans.

Reagan would not have intervened at all.


7 posted on 05/03/2024 7:54:30 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

Reagan would have threatened to use nuclear weapons on the Russians. Then he’ll send 101st airborne to defend Kyiv just as the Russians were massing in Belarus just before the invasion.


8 posted on 05/03/2024 7:54:32 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Reagan would not have intervened at all.

He did call the Soviet Union the "Evil Empire".

9 posted on 05/03/2024 7:56:12 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

Reagan wouldn’t have orchestrated a coup in Ukraine and militarized it’s border thus prompting the Russian invasion.


10 posted on 05/03/2024 7:57:53 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

Or we could have worked with Gorbachev to help Russia transition into a European style democracy rather than send over free market fanatics who inadvertently handed over all of Russia’s resources to the oligarchs.


11 posted on 05/03/2024 7:59:13 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear (Kafka was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

That was the Commie Soviet Union, not the same thing.


12 posted on 05/03/2024 7:59:36 AM PDT by cowboyusa (YESHUA IS KING OF AMERICA, AND HE WILL HAVE NO OTHER GODS BEFORE HIM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cowboyusa

No. But Putin is trying to reestablish the Russian Empire by annexing Belarus and conquering Ukraine.


13 posted on 05/03/2024 8:02:24 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus
How Reagan and Thatcher would have defeated Putin in Ukraine

By acting Honorably and being Trustworthy.

They would have jailed HomoNazi Grifter Zelensky for life, and Putin would have had no cause to defend helpless Russians.

14 posted on 05/03/2024 8:05:33 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (Celebrate Decivilization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rrrod

President Reagan is still kryptonite to the Russophiles.


15 posted on 05/03/2024 8:06:53 AM PDT by marcusmaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

A bunch of “what if “ , the Hopium supply is running low !! 😂


16 posted on 05/03/2024 8:08:21 AM PDT by OldHarbor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
Or we could have worked with Gorbachev to help Russia transition into a European style democracy rather than send over free market fanatics who inadvertently handed over all of Russia’s resources to the oligarchs.

If George H.W. Bush won reelection in 1992, I believe he would have done more to help the Russians. Marshall Plan for the former Soviet Union or something.


17 posted on 05/03/2024 8:09:05 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican; All

Richard Nixon on Russia

Excerpts from Richard Nixon’s Beyond Peace, published in 1994

https://www.nixonfoundation.org/2022/02/richard-nixon-russia/


18 posted on 05/03/2024 8:13:25 AM PDT by marcusmaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Allegra; AndyJackson; ANKE69; bimboeruption; Candor7; Carriage Hill; Cold_Red_Steel; dforest; ...
Another Marcusmucinex spam post.

ZEEPER-FOLLIES-PINGLIST

ZEEPER FOLLIES PINGLIST!!

(((PING!)))

Join and laugh at the Zeepers!!

19 posted on 05/03/2024 8:16:03 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Don’t forget to polish your hammer and sickle pin for next weeks “Victory” parade in Red Square!


20 posted on 05/03/2024 8:17:53 AM PDT by marcusmaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson