Replies

interesting paragraph from the Willoughby paper:

‘Neither rabies vaccine nor rabies immune globulin was administered because of the patient’s demonstrated immune response and the potential for harm from a potentiated immune response.8 Amantadine (200 mg per day, administered enterally) was added on the fourth hospital day because of its in vitro activity against rabies virus, as well as its antiexcitotoxic activity, which is distributed more rostrally in the brain than is that of ketamine.9,10’

so no jab was administered, per commonsense, traditional medical practice. you just don’t jab into the teeth of an infection (and so neither do you into the teeth of an epidemic) as was done with the wuflu.

and the rabies infection was treated rationally with antiviral and apparently supplements like Vit C. makes good sense to me as a non-physician. interesting that the treatment strategy also has parallels to the anti-viral treatments that Zelenko and Frontline docs suggested and practiced for the wuflu, i.e., instead of the lungs, they apparently were medicating to try and limit the inflammatory immune response in the brain.