[juzcuz]

buggz--

I wonder how Dusek is going to explain to the jury in his summation (the middle of Feb.) drop date and DW's guilt.

I would think that he has to address the info. and somehow give cause as to why the jury should dismiss those dates. I wonder if he can and what reliable options he has?????

[juzcuz]

Buggz

I think Dusek, in his summation, will want to dismiss Goff, Haskell, Faulkner, and Hall. I think he'll use Blackbourne and Wecht to try to prove the others as unreliable. The problem with this is, that Blackbourne and Wecht left the latest date of Feb. 16 open as a possible exposure date. I don't think he'll use Rodriquez at all.

So far we have: Rodriquez- Jan.16 - Feb.6 Anthro.
Blackbourne- Feb. 1 - Feb.16 Path.
Wecht- Feb. 1 - Feb.16 Path.
Goff- Feb. 9 - Feb.14 Ento.
Haskell- Feb.11 - Feb.21 Ento.
Faulkner- Feb.16 - Feb.18 Ento.
Hall- Feb.12 - Feb.23 Ento.

If Feldman stands on Feb. 16 as the latest exposure date then he has on his side : Blackbourne, Wecht, Goff, Haskell, Faulkner, and Hall. Six to nothing in scientific favor of DW's innocence.

[FresnoDA]

Spec....check in..what is your status? Hope you are well...

[spectre]

Tune in this morning, when the two lawyers will battle out the Jury instructions in front of Judge Mudd..to begin shortly!

sw

[is_is]

If i were the defense, i would try to enter into evidense transcripts of other trials where the DA was fawning and DRUELING all over one of these buggsperts testimony because it FIT HIS CASE!!!!...I'm not a lawyer but i would try and put Dufus on TRIAL!!!